Team,
Customer is asking for assistance to help understand the model better. See below:
I have been simulating in Hyperlynx using the model for the DS125BR820. I am seeing somethings I can’t explain.
I have a model with a processor serdes output on one end of a Linesim schematic through some s-parameter models to the RX of the DS125VR820. I have a 100 ohm resistor at the redriver between P and N.
What I am seeing that really confuses me is the amplitude of the waverforms does not match my expectations. This should be the waveform out of the receiver of the redriver, but I am not sure. I say that because the RX model is the one that the BST value is set on.
What I get is for BST=0 (these are sort of representative values – not exact values)
BST Amplitude
0 +/- 0.24V
1 +/- 0.20V (yes the amplitude is reduced, this is repeatable)
2 +/- 0.27V
3 +/- 0.29V
If I replace the DS125BR820 model with a Mentor generic SerDes receiver model, or a processor specific RX model the amplitude is always around +/- 0.5V. Granted those specific RX AMI models may be doing some amplification – but so should the redriver I’d assume. Mentor (ok Siemens) provided a means to connect the RX and TX of the redriver together through a spreadsheet tool that calls Hyperlynx in the background to feed data from the Redriver RX to the Redriver TX. With that setup I can get open eyes with the generic SerDes Models. And I see some small amount of change with the change in BST. Longer backplane transmission lines do require a little more BST, and BST=0 doesn’t work for them, but the relationship isn’t real clear cut either. I just am not sure I am seeing as much gain as one would think.
Regards,
Aaron