DP83867IS: RGZ package - thermal pad and pin footprint

Hi Michael,

According to my local datasheet, I am only seeing references to RGZ0048B. I am using SNLS504D. Older datasheets (versions C, B) are also using RGZ0048B. 

Could you please point me to where RGZ0048A is located?

Sincerely,

Gerome

Hi Gerome,

the datasheet online today (11/20) is showing both versions of the package. It is also version SNLS504D.: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/snls504d/snls504d.pdf?ts=1700467271217 

Pages 123-125 are showing RGZ0048B

Pages 126-128 are showing RGZ0048A

Is the conclusion that only RGZ0048B is now used and customer needs to use this footprint?

Thanks and best regards,

Michael

Hi Michael,

We are looking into this. However, please note that US offices are on a short week due to Thanksgiving, and you may be receiving an update next week.
Sincerely,

Gerome

Hi Gerome,

thanks!. Looking forward on your feedback and clarification.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Best regards,

Michael

Thank you Michael! 

Happy Thanksgiving!

Sincerely,

Gerome

Hello Gerome,

one important questions next to the thermal pad is the size of the landing pads for the pins.

In the picture above you can see the solder layout that has been used in the past by customer (red pads). There the pads have been longer than they seem now. Has there been a change?

Thanks and best regards,

Michael

Hi Michael,

Gerome is currently out of office and will provide you an response with in this week.

Thank you for understanding.

--

Regards,

Hillman lin

Hi Michael,

Thank you for your patience. Our teams are nearly all the way back to full strength following Thanksgiving break, and we should have an update on the appropriate version by EoW.

Sincerely,

Gerome

Hi Michael,

Our team is asking if you could please send the top markings and back side of the IC's in question. We would like to understand when these parts were manufactured. If you also could send the reel information that would be much appreciated.

Sincerely,

Gerome

Hello Gerome,

This question is on my mind as well.
Can you give me an answer to this?

Michael Daimer said:

Is the conclusion that only RGZ0048B is now used and customer needs to use this footprint?

Sincerely,
Ryu.

Hi Ryu,

This topic is ongoing, but needs Michael's inputs on the items I had requested to continue discussion.

Sincerely,

Gerome

Hello Gerome,

My question is about when I purchase this device in the future.
If the only footprint currently made is RGZ0048B and I am going to buy it from now on, I would like to ask if the footprint should be adapted to RGZ0048B.

Sincerely,
Ryu.

Hello Ryu,

I am wait for Michael's comments before I can address your question.

Sincerely,

Gerome

Hello Gerome,

I would like to know the answer to this question as soon as possible, but should I start a separate thread?

Sincerely,
Ryu.

Hi Ryu,

We are looking to obtain more information on this matter at the moment.

Sincerely,

Gerome

Hello Gerome,

it took some time, but here is the top marking of the device.

I read:

DP83867IS

TI79

COYT G4

Looking forward on your feedback. You also can reply to my @ti.com Email address, if required.

Best regards,

Michael

Hi Michael,

Thanks. I will loop this to the team and we should have a response by EoW worst case.

Sincerely,

Gerome