DP83867IR: Question on Figure 29 in February 2015 datasheet (SNLS484F)

Angelo Keene

Part Number: DP83867IR

When using the RGX package, can you explain how figure 29 gives a PHY address of 0b1001? In that figure, shouldn't RX_D3 be tied asserted high instead of RX_D2, and RX_D1 and RX_D2 grounded? I'm trying to figure out how the PHY_ADD0-PHY_ADD3 correspond to the strapping in Table 5. During 'strapping time', doesn't PHY_ADD0-3 correspond to the strapping of RX_D0-3?

over 1 year ago

0 Evan Mayhew over 1 year ago

TI__Mastermind 24988 points

Hi Angelo,

Which figure are you referring to? I do not see Fig.29 in datasheet.

This is the example I see for address 0b1001, and the strapping looks correct:

Thank you,

Evan

0 Angelo Keene over 1 year ago

Prodigy 10 points

Here's the specific picture from the datasheet - is there a revision to this document that I may need?

0 Alvaro (Al-vuh-roe) Reyes over 1 year ago in reply to Angelo Keene

TI__Mastermind 19621 points

Hi Angelo,

Evan is away on TBK, he will be back Tuesday March 5th.

I very briefly read through your query and I believe you are looking at an older version of the data sheet. More than likely this was a typo in the old revision that has been fixed. Please find the most up to date one here:

SNLS484G DP83867IR/CR Data sheet

Regards,

Alvaro

0 Angelo Keene over 1 year ago in reply to Alvaro (Al-vuh-roe) Reyes

Prodigy 10 points

Thanks!

Interface

Interface forum

DP83867IR: Question on Figure 29 in February 2015 datasheet (SNLS484F)