• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 33 subscribers
  • Views 445 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TFP410: replacement for Sil164CTG64

Stefan Lintner
Expert 5205 points
Part Number: TFP410


Tool/software:

Hi,

customer is looking into replacing Sil164CTG64 with TFP410PAP.

Would you recommend any other device?

customer has following concerns regarding TFP410:

  1. Higher Power Consumption: The TFP410 datasheet indicates higher power consumption compared to the Sil164CTG64. Are there any specific operating conditions that might influence this?
  2. Internal Register Compatibility: We require compatibility with the existing Sil164 register set for a smooth transition. Can you confirm the level of register compatibility between the TFP410 and Sil164?
  3. Additional Features/Differences: Are there any additional features or significant characteristic differences between the TFP410 and Sil164 that we should be aware of?
  4. End-of-Life (EOL) Plans: Could you share TI's current End-of-Life (EOL) timeline for the TFP410?

BR,
Stefan

  • +1
    TI__Mastermind 42211 points
    Stefan Lintner said:
    Higher Power Consumption: The TFP410 datasheet indicates higher power consumption compared to the Sil164CTG64. Are there any specific operating conditions that might influence this?

    Unfortunately there is no operating condition to reduce the power consumption as the resolution of the input plays a role in the power consumption. The lower the resolution the lower the power draw. what resolution are you using? I can gather some data in lab using the resolution you are planning to use. 

    Stefan Lintner said:
    Internal Register Compatibility: We require compatibility with the existing Sil164 register set for a smooth transition. Can you confirm the level of register compatibility between the TFP410 and Sil164?

    The register are very compatible as seen in the datasheets.

    SIL164

     

    TFP410

    Stefan Lintner said:
    Additional Features/Differences: Are there any additional features or significant characteristic differences between the TFP410 and Sil164 that we should be aware of?

    They should be very similar in implementation with no significant differences

    Stefan Lintner said:
    End-of-Life (EOL) Plans: Could you share TI's current End-of-Life (EOL) timeline for the TFP410

    I am looking into this and I will get back to you as soon I have an answer

  • +1 in reply to Vishesh Pithadiya
    TI__Mastermind 42211 points

    Hey Stefan,

    There is no plan to EOL this device yet. Who is the customer for this project?