This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

DP83869HM: PHY Capacitive Coupling (Transformerless Operation) Configuration

Part Number: DP83869HM
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83869

Tool/software:

Hi Team,

We are considering configuring PHY Capacitive Coupling (Transformerless Operation) for the DP83869HM.
Please tell us the following points about PHY Capacitive Coupling (Transformerless Operation) for the DP83869HM.
Also, we checked the following thread as a method of capacitive coupling for DP83869HM.
<e2e>
e2e.ti.com/.../faq-ti-ethernet-phy-capacitive-coupling-transformerless-operation

In the document AN-1519 DP83848 PHYTER Transformerless Ethernet Operation (SNLA088A) in the main text, the recommended capacitor value was listed in "5. Capacitor selection".

◇Excerpt from SNLA088A

Please let me know the following points regarding the above information:

[Question 1]
In the above datasheet, AN-1519 DP83848 PHYTER Transformerless Ethernet Operation (SNLA088A), "5. Capacitor selection" states that the recommended value of the capacitive coupling capacitor is 33nF.
Is the recommended value for the capacitive coupling capacitor the same for 10/100/1000BASE circuit configurations?

[Question 2]
The datasheet above, AN-1519 DP83848 PHYTER Transformerless Ethernet Operation (SNLA088A), states that the recommended capacitor value is 33nF, with a minimum value of 30.42nF (@2MHz).
Therefore, I believe the recommended product would be 33nF±1% or 33nF±5%.
Is the above understanding correct?

[Question 3]
We checked the DP83869 EVM circuit diagram (snlr042) and BOMLIST (snlr043).
However, in the DP83869 EVM circuit diagram (snlr042), the capacitive coupling capacitor is 0.033uF±10% and has a voltage resistance of 10V.
When checking the capacitor's tolerance, it is a ±10% product, so in the worst case, it fluctuates from 29.7 to 36.3nF, so we believe that there are cases where the minimum value of 30.42nF is not met.
Also, we believe that a capacitor with a voltage resistance of 1500Vdc or more is necessary to meet the AC and DC isolation requirements of IEEE802.3.
Regarding the parts used in the DP83869 EVM, are they recommended capacitor parts?
◇Excerpt from the DP83869 EVM circuit diagram (snlr042)

[Question 4]
We are considering operating our circuit at 10/100/1000BASE.
However, the TI application note AN-1519 DP83848 PHYTER Transformerless Ethernet Operation (SNLA088A) only describes a circuit for capacitive coupling at 10/100BASE.
Is the DP83869HM a part that supports all speeds for 10/100/1000BASE capacitive coupling configurations?

Best Regards,

  • Hi User!

    It seems like you have answered all of your questions! I'm glad to see that you were able to find all the relevant documents we have available for this topic. Yes, the 33nF are the correct value to use for capacitive coupling and the DP83869HM will support 10/100/1000 speeds. I am unsure why the tolerance of the capacitors is 10%, I agree with your statement, please use a capacitor with a tighter tolerance. As seen on the schematic, if capacitive coupling is desired then the connection goes PHY - Caps - Connector, that's it! Because the DP83869HM is a voltage mode driver, no PUs are required on the MDI lines.

    A word of warning, capacitive coupling is not defined in the IEEE802.3 standard and may not pass compliance tests and have worse EMC/EMI performance. 

    Regards,

    Alvaro

  • Hi Alvaro,

    Thank you for your reply.
    I have additional questions regarding your answer.
    Please answer the following:

    [Question 5]
    According to TI application note AN-1519 DP83848 PHYTER Transformerless Ethernet Operation (SNLA088A), it is recommended that for capacitively coupled interface configurations, transformerless operation should be limited to forced 100 Mb/s mode and auto-negotiation should be disabled.
    Does the DP83869HM capacitively coupled configuration support operation with auto-negotiation enabled for all 10/100/1000BASE speeds?
    Or is it recommended to disable auto-negotiation for all 10/100/1000BASE speeds?

    [Question 6]

    A word of warning, capacitive coupling is not defined in the IEEE802.3 standard and may not pass compliance tests and have worse EMC/EMI performance. 

    Regarding the above, I would like to know the following points.
    Regarding the DP83869HM, in another thread it was stated that ETHER compliance testing has not been performed with capacitive coupling.
    I also found an answer that said, "If you use the DP83869HM, we will support you in debugging if a compliance test failure occurs."
    We are also planning to create an evaluation board for capacitive coupling of the DP83869HM and perform an ETHER compliance test.
    In the case of a capacitive coupling configuration, would you be able to support us if the ETHER compliance test fails?
    <e2e description>

    <e2e_URL>
    e2e.ti.com/.../4480798

    Best Regards,

  • Hi User,

    The DP83869 will support all speeds with auto-negotiation ON. Please note that we do not support 1000Mbps with Auto-negotiation OFF in any configuration.

    Of course, we will assist you with compliance.

    Regards,

    Alvaro

  • Hi Alvaro,

    Thank you for your reply.
    Please tell me about the following.

    The DP83869 will support all speeds with auto-negotiation ON. Please note that we do not support 1000Mbps with Auto-negotiation OFF in any configuration.

    Please explain the above.
    I understand that it is not supported when auto-negotiation is set to OFF, but is it possible to support a connection between boards with the speed fixed at 1000Mbps in a capacitively coupled configuration?
    Also, does this mean that it is not possible to support a connection between boards with the speed fixed at 1000Mbps in a capacitively coupled configuration and a transformer configuration?

    A word of warning, capacitive coupling is not defined in the IEEE802.3 standard and may not pass compliance tests and have worse EMC/EMI performance. 
    Of course, we will assist you with compliance.

    Regarding the support, I would appreciate your help.
    Please tell me about the above.
    I heard in another thread that your company has not performed compliance testing with capacitive coupling.
    Regarding the above support, is it correct that you can give advice on improving the characteristics of the compliance test, but are not sure whether you can guarantee that the test will pass?

    Best Regards,

  • Hi User

    I understand that it is not supported when auto-negotiation is set to OFF, but is it possible to support a connection between boards with the speed fixed at 1000Mbps in a capacitively coupled configuration?
    Also, does this mean that it is not possible to support a connection between boards with the speed fixed at 1000Mbps in a capacitively coupled configuration and a transformer configuration?

    1000 Mbps communication is 100% possible with a capacitive coupled configuration. The point I was trying to make is that auto-negotiation should always be enabled in 1000Mbps. If only 1000Mbps is desired, de-advertising 10/100 speeds in Reg 0x4 is the preferred method, while keeping auto-negotiation enabled. Please see the following FAQ for more information 

    I heard in another thread that your company has not performed compliance testing with capacitive coupling.
    Regarding the above support, is it correct that you can give advice on improving the characteristics of the compliance test, but are not sure whether you can guarantee that the test will pass?

    This is correct.

    Regards,

    Alvaro

  • Hi Alvaro,

    Thank you for your response.
    I will close this thread.

    Best Regards,