Tool/software:
Dear team,
Should we pay attention to the wire resistance highlighted in yellow?
Louis Lin
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
The image did not attach; you have to use the "Insert"/"Image" menu entry below the text box.
In general, RS-485 is designed to tolerate the voltage drop over long wires; drivers generates more than ±1.5 V over the load, while receivers detect inputs as low as ±0.2 V.
Dear Clemens,
Here is the updated image file. Do you mean that if the voltage does not drop below 0.2V, the communication will work fine? I believe this may be difficult to let voltage drop from 1.5V to 0.2V with a standard wire on the PCB. Therefore, I can conclude that using a standard wire is acceptable without needing to be overly concerned about the wire resistance.
Louis Lin
Hi Louis,
Clemens is correct - the specific highlighted traces shown above are going to have negligible series resistance.
That being said there are a couple things that I wanted to point out:
1. Series resistance of wiring / cabling is not negligible at distance - if the distance between nodes is large it will matter. For like 150mm to 300mm long traces it generally isn't an issue.
2. Ideally the traces are still impedance matched - RS-485 should use a 120 ohm characteristic cable / traces - so the trace should be 120 ohm characteristic impedance; so that will impact overall impedance of the trace. Impedance matching is strongly suggested with this device for ~4.7m and above (the device is slow enough where shorter bus systems really don't need to be impedance matched) - and that 4.7m is the point where the device could cause reflections at signal transitions regardless of data rate.
Best,
Parker Dodson