Tool/software:
Hi team,
In a MIPI DPHY CSI-2 application muxing two cameras, are TS3DV642 and TS3DV642-Q1 equivalent?
Or is there any reason (other temperature range) to choose the -Q1 version?
Thanks for support
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Tool/software:
Hi team,
In a MIPI DPHY CSI-2 application muxing two cameras, are TS3DV642 and TS3DV642-Q1 equivalent?
Or is there any reason (other temperature range) to choose the -Q1 version?
Thanks for support
Hi Luca,
The -Q1 is the automotive qualified device so it goes through some more qualification steps to make it Q100 certified. But aside from that, they will be the same device so if you don't need the auto qualifications then the TS3DV642 (non-Q1) will likely be the better option since you would be paying a little extra for that -Q1.
Thanks,
Rami