This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

DS92LV2412: DS92LV2412 Lock Loss Issue at Low Temperature

Guru 12065 points
Part Number: DS92LV2412
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LV2411

Tool/software:

Hi,

Our customer is currently mass-producing products using the DS92LV2412, and they have observed a lock loss issue particularly under cold temperature conditions in a few units. This lock loss manifests as flickering on the connected LCD. The customer has already performed the following verification steps:

  • Conducted cooling tests using the same PCB revision: lock loss occurred only on defective units, while normal units did not show the issue.

  • Removed the LCD to eliminate potential noise effects: the issue persisted only on defective units.

  • Performed low and high-temperature tests: lock loss was particularly evident under low-temperature conditions.

In addition, they have implemented countermeasures recommended in the datasheet, such as noise isolation on the VDDPR line using beads and capacitors; however, the issue has not been resolved.

We have reviewed related discussions on TI's E2E forum (e.g., Lock Status Lost, Recommended Decoupling Capacitor Value), and understand that most lock instability issues are typically attributed to environmental factors such as power supply quality, signal integrity, and PCB layout, rather than intrinsic device failures.

Based on the above, we would appreciate your confirmation on the following two points:

Question1: Have there been any known failure reports related to DS92LV2412 lot marking "28AX4JUG3"? Two defects occurred in the same lot.
Question2 If environmental factors (power supply, signal integrity, layout) have already been optimized but lock loss still persists, are there any further recommended countermeasures?

Best regards,
Conor

  • Hi Conor,

    How many of these units were produced and tested? And how many boards were found with this issue?

    Is the flickering issue reproducible and occurring every time after power-up?

    Have they done any ABA swaps already to check whether the issue is following the chips or boards?

    The devices are Ser-Des pairs; how have the customer isolated that the issue is with the deserializer in particular?

    If the issue is seen only with particular lots and it follows the device only, among a large number of units tested, then we could discuss with the quality team.

    Best regards,
    Ikram

  • Hi Ikram,

    The customer followed the instructions in the "Related Questions" section and decoupled with beads and 22μF, 0.1μF, and 0.01μF, but the situation did not improve. Therefore, we believe that the unlocking of the defective product is part-specific and temperature-dependent.

    We will answer your question.

    How many of these units were produced and tested? And how many boards were found with this issue?

    More than 10,000 units were produced in 2023, and two of them have flickering. The defect rate is 0.02%.

    Is the flickering issue reproducible and occurring every time after power-up?

    This occurs every time the power is turned on. It is highly reproducible.

    Have they done any ABA swaps already to check whether the issue is following the chips or boards?

    The problem can be improved by replacing the IC. Also, when the defective part is replaced with a different board, the flickering occurs again on the new board.

    The devices are Ser-Des pairs; how have the customer isolated that the issue is with the deserializer in particular?

    The serializer uses a DS92LV2411. The output signal of the DS92LV2411 was checked with an oscilloscope, and no problems such as jitter or insufficient amplitude were found. Changing the serializer did not improve the situation, and flickering occurs due to the deserializer.

    Thanks,

    Conor

  • Hi Conor,

    1. If possible could you share the schematic of the DES, so we can check that all the necessary external components are added.

    2. And what is the pixel clock rate they are running at? If they run at a higher or lower rate, is lock stable even under stress temperature conditions?

    3. Also, if the power-up sequence correct? It's described in the "9.2.2.2 Power Up Requirements and PDB Pin" section.

    4. When the flickering occurs is LOCK dropping temporarily and coming back? Could the customer please probe and share the waveform?

    It would help if we could also check the jitter and other components in the path. It's possible that the external components (other converters and devices in the signal path) could be operating out of specification and causing SI issues, jitter. 

    Best regards,
    Ikram

  • Hi Ikram,

    We have included information about your question in the attached Excel file, so please take a look.

    DS92LV2412_20250509.xlsx

    Changing the pixel clock frequency improved the lockout issue, so we believe this is due to the characteristics of the PLL phase compensation.

    Thanks,

    Conor

  • Thank you Conor. Please give me 1-2 days to look into this and get back to you.

    Best regards,
    Ikram 

  • Hi Ikram,

    OK, we look forward to hearing from you.

    Thanks,

    Conor

  • Hi Conor,

    I see that the customer mentioned that the system does not lose LOCK when they increase the frequency higher to ~12 MHz, instead of the nominal 6 MHz. It would help if we could check whether this is related to low frequency jitter. You mentioned that the customer checked for jitter, could you share those findings?

    Also, what other devices are in this video signal chain? It would help to check whether those components/devices are within spec or if they have any effect.

    Could you also please contact the quality team and we can get feedback from them if they have seen any similar issues with these parts.

    Best regards,
    Ikram

  • Hi Ikram,

     You mentioned that the customer checked for jitter, could you share those findings?

    A. We attempted to measure the jitter, but the waveform disappeared when the temperature was lowered, so we were unable to perform the measurement. However, we did observe a slight shift in the timing under those conditions. Please see the Excel file below for details.


    Also, what other devices are in this video signal chain? It would help to check whether those components/devices are within spec or if they have any effect.

    A. The configuration is included in the attached file.

    20250522_Inquiry.xlsx

    If there are any suggestions or improvements that could be made through device settings, we would greatly appreciate your guidance. Additionally, regarding the PLL lock loss issue, we observed the following behavior when changing the output frequency:

    1. CLKOUT = 12 MHz → No lock loss (even under low temperature)

    2. CLKOUT = 8 MHz → No lock loss

    3. CLKOUT = 6.86 MHz → No lock loss

    4. CLKOUT = 6 MHz → Lock loss occurs

    From this, we suspect there may be some threshold or behavior change between 6.86 MHz and 6 MHz that is affecting PLL lock stability.

    Thanks,

    Conor

  • Hi Conor,

    1. From the diagrams you shared, it seems the deserializer PCLK output has some variation. That variations could be more than what's tolerated and be correlated to lock loss.

    It would also help to check the jitter on the DES input at the RIN pins.

    Can you also ask the customer to share how they measured jitter, including the bandwidth limits and what oscilloscope they used.

    2. Can you also ask the customer to measure power supply noise for both SER and DES. The datasheet has a description for this. I am suggesting this because this issue is occurring at lower frequencies.


    Best regards,
    Ikram