Part Number: DP83869HM
i have designed the schematic, with 3 power sequence for DP83869HM.
VDDIO >>> 3.3V >> 2.5V, 1.8V and 1.0V
all the rails will be up in 3ms.
Question is " Is it valid sequence" ?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: DP83869HM
i have designed the schematic, with 3 power sequence for DP83869HM.
VDDIO >>> 3.3V >> 2.5V, 1.8V and 1.0V
all the rails will be up in 3ms.
Question is " Is it valid sequence" ?
Hi Visweswara,
To clarify, you will bring VDDIO up first, then 2.5V, 1.8V, and 1.1V simultaneously, all with a ramp time of 3ms correct?
This would violate the minimum time for T2 in the datasheet. VDDIO needs to ramp at the same time or after the 2.5V and 1.1V rails.

I recommend aligning the rise of VDDIO with the other three rails or delaying VDDIO slightly.
Best,
Shane
what goes wrong in the power down sequence ? if i remove 1.0V and 2.5V supplies keeping 3.3V (VDDIO) will it throw any garbage value ? or all the voltage rails will go down by 1ms - 10ms , will it throw any garbage value on the lines ?
Hi Visweswara,
There is no required power down sequence, however once any of the three power rails go low it should prevent the PHY from transferring data. By garbage value on the lines, are you referring to the MDI, MII, or SMI(MDIO/MDC) lines?
The PHY should not throw bad values as it is powering down, however it would stop responding to the SMI bus and kill any link on the MDI.
Best,
Shane
Bad values should not come out of these interfaces when all rails are powered down. Without the 1V rail the SMI should stop responding and the link will drop on the MDI without the 2.5V rail. Without a link on the MDI, nothing would come out of the MII.
Best,
Shane