Part Number: SN65LVDT101
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65LVDS100
Hi,
We are working on testing system and want to use your part as described in diagram below. Does this configuration will work? 
Part Number: SN65LVDT101
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65LVDS100
Hi,
We are working on testing system and want to use your part as described in diagram below. Does this configuration will work? 
Hi Stanislav,
SN65LVDT101 has a VCC range of 3.0 to 3.6V, so the 2.5V power will cause issues. Do you have 3.3V rail on that board?
Regards,
Matt
Hi Matt,
Thank you for the reply! I looked at datasheet again after I posted the question, I can supply SN65LVDT101 with 3.3V too, the question - will it work with the Thevenin termination circuit?
I did the simulation of generic LVPECL output driver and in simulation the voltages are in the acceptable ranges of the SN65LVDS100. Or another option is to use SY89327LMG-TR with 3.3V instead of SN65LVDT101 with 3.3V.
I found in the datasheet of TLK1521 that there was built-in termination for output drivers, but can't find any information or circuit for this termination, also the client can't tell what was his calculations when he developed the original version with TLK1521.

Hi Stanislav,
Ideally, you should have symmetrical termination where the pullup and pulldowns on each line are equal value to avoid impedance mismatches. (see below). However, if this was done because of fail-safe biasing to introduce an offset in the event of an open circuit, then it should be fine.

regards,
Matt
Thank you for the explanation. Yes, we can't change UUT side so we need to adapt ourself to it.