Hi,
For one of my design,Im planning to use the AM26LV31 and AM26LV32 device and the interface drawing is shown below.
And below is the comparison table between SP3490 and AM26LV31 and 32.
SP3490 Vs AM26LV31/32 |
|||||
S.No |
Specifications |
SP3490 |
AM26LV31 |
AM26LV32 |
Status |
1 |
Supply Voltage |
3.3V |
3.3V |
NA |
Pass |
2 |
Supply current |
2mA |
100uA |
NA |
Pass |
3 |
Minimum data rate |
10Mbps |
32Mbps |
NA |
Pass |
4 |
Device Enable option |
No |
Yes |
NA |
Pass |
5 |
Voh Min for driver |
NA |
1.85V |
NA |
Pass |
6 |
Vol Max for driver |
NA |
1.05V |
NA |
Pass |
7 |
VIH min for driver |
2V |
2V |
NA |
Pass |
8 |
VIL max for driver |
0.8V |
0.8V |
NA |
Pass |
9 |
Differential output voltage with load 50R |
2-3.3V |
0.95V to 1.5V typicalat 100R |
NA |
TBD |
10 |
Driver common mode voltage |
3V max |
1.3V to 1.8V at 100R |
NA |
TBD |
11 |
Driver input to Output,tPLH |
60ns |
12ns max |
NA |
Pass |
12 |
Driver input to Output,tPHL |
60ns |
12ns max |
NA |
Pass |
13 |
Differential Driver Skew |
2ns |
0.5 to 1.5ns |
NA |
Pass |
14 |
Driver Rise time |
5ns typ.20ns max |
3ns typ |
NA |
Pass |
15 |
Driver fall time |
5ns typ.20ns max |
3ns typ |
NA |
Pass |
16 |
Differential receiver input threshold |
+/-0.2V |
NA |
+/-0.2V |
Pass |
17 |
Receiver Input Hysterisis |
25mV |
NA |
50mV |
Pass |
18 |
Voh Min for Receiver |
VCC-0.4V |
NA |
2.4V |
Pass |
19 |
Vol Max for Receiver |
0.4V |
NA |
0.5V |
Pass |
20 |
VIH min for Receiver |
NA |
NA |
2V |
Pass |
21 |
VIL max for Receiver |
NA |
NA |
0.8V |
Pass |
22 |
Receiver input to Output,tPLH |
85ns |
NA |
20ns |
Pass |
23 |
Receiver input to Output,tPHL |
85ns |
NA |
20ns |
Pass |
24 |
Differential Receiver Skew |
4ns |
NA |
6ns |
Pass |
25 |
Receiver Rise time |
No Information |
NA |
5ns |
Pass |
26 |
Receiver fall time |
No Information |
NA |
5ns |
Pass |
27 |
ESD Voltage |
+/-2Kv |
+/-15Kv |
+/-15Kv |
Pass |
28 |
Operating Temperature |
0-70'C |
0-70'C |
0-70'C |
Pass |
When we analysed,the 26LV31 and SP3490 transmitter output voltage seems to be different.But receiver specifications remains the same.
Could you pls advice me,whether this proposal will work without creating any problem.
Thanks-Arumugam