This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

DS26C32AM Cold Sparing

In my current test configuration, I have an RS-422 interface that uses the CMOS version of the quad differential line receiver (DS26C32AM) in the destination unit under test (UUT).

During testing, I've come across a test configuration that leaves the destination UUT partially powered, despite main power being removed.

Source UUT                      Destination UUT                Result

ON, RS-422 enabled         ON, RS-422 enabled           Nominal RS-422 Ops

ON, RS-422 enabled                 OFF                             Destination UUT Partially Powered On (VCC Rail Only)

ON, RS-422 disabled                 OFF                             Destination UUT Powered Off

When the source UUT is powered and its RS-422 interface is enabled and active or idling "HIGH," the destination UUT's VCC rail is partially powered even though main power to the destination UUT has been removed.

Based on this observation, there is current flow into the destination UUT's VCC rail through the RS-422 driver-receiver interface.

There are likely two possibilities for the current flow:

    1. The current flows through the DS26C32AM's protection diodes and returns through chassis since the both UUT's secondary returns (VCC_RTN) are tied to chassis.

    2. The current flows through the DS26C32AM's resistors that are pulled up to the VCC rail and returns to chassis as described in the first possibility.

This would be the case if the protection diodes have already failed open due to high currents in this partially powered configuration.

Questions about this partially powered configuration:

    1. Is there any concern for that current flow in this anomalous test configuration could exceed the current ratings of the DS26C32AM's protection diodes or pull-up resistors?

    2. If the source UUT's RS-422 driver has an output short-circuit limit, is the DS26C32AM's receiver input current limited to that amount?

    3. Are there any unpowered resistance and/or diode measurements that can be made on the DS26C32AM part to determine if the part or its driver input has been overstressed?

Thanks.

DS26C32AM - Quad Differential Line Receiver.pdf
  • Hi Richard,

    Input of DS26C32 has high input impedance to create a fail/safe mechanism to prevent self oscillation when the cable is not connected or when the input is not being driven. The input has a high value pull up Resistor and pull down biased to create a high output when the input is not connected. When the source is enabled and the device is powered off, the device attempts to power up through the high pull up R. It turns on partially because the input impedance is very high, compared to the termination Resistor, and because of the high input impedance the voltage is not high enough to power the device. Also, the current limit on the driver kicks in much sooner than the device powers up through the high value pull up Resistor. So as long as the source is another RS422 driver we do not see any problem under this condition. You can monitor the Vdd pin to measure the voltage and indirectly measure the current being drawn by the device.

    Regards,,nasser

  • Hi Nasser,

    Thanks for the response. It was very helpful.

    One of the issues I’m trying to resolve is the amount of current on the VDD rail of the unpowered DS26C32AM part due to the powered interfacing RS-422 driver.   I’d like to know more about the implementation of the input signal resistor networks and ESD diodes in the DS26C32AM part. I have attached a “pdf” file of what I think is the implementation of the part’s input signal resistor networks and ESD diodes. The “pdf” also shows expected current paths when the DS26C32AM part is unpowered and the interfacing RS-422 driver is powered and enabled.

    Based on the assumed implementation, there are two likely possibilities for the current flow:

        1. The current flows through the DS26C32AM's protection diodes and returns through chassis since the both UUT's secondary returns (VDD_RTN) are tied to chassis.

        2. The current flows through the DS26C32AM 's resistors that are pulled up to the VDD rail and returns to chassis as described in the first possibility. This would be the case if the protection diodes have already failed open due to high currents in this partially powered configuration.

    If the protection diodes are present at the DS26C32AM receiver inputs, then the current could have been up to the output short-circuit current limit of the driver. If no protection diodes, then the current is limited by the high resistance of the pull-up resistors.

    So, my questions are as follows:

        1. Your initial reply did not mention protection diodes. Do the DS26C32AM receiver inputs include protection diodes? If so, it would allow for greater current to flow to the VDD rail than the high resistance pull-up resistors.

        2. Are the resistor networks implementations in the attached “pdf” file match the ones in the DS26C32AM inputs? Are the resistance values close to the ones in the actual part’s networks?

    Thanks,

    Richard

    1805.Assumed Input Structure of DS26C32AM Receiver - 14 Aug 2013.pdf

  • Hi Richard,

    1). Yes indeed you are correct. There is ESD diode protection and these are designed to take far greater current than the fail/safe Resistors can handle.

    2). I believe you have the right idea. We have the ESD diode and then you would see the fail/safe Rs in order ot K Ohms.

    Regards,,nasser 

  • Hi Nasser,

    Thanks for the reply.

    I have a few more questions about the DS26C32AM’s inputs. I just want to make sure I understand how the inputs are structured.

        1. You answered my question #2 by stating that the resistor network implementations in the earlier posted “Assumed Input Structure of DS26C32AM Receiver - 14 Aug 2013.pdf” file “has the right idea.” But your answer also stated that “We have the ESD diode and then you would see the fail/safe Rs in order ot K Ohms.” Does this means that each DS26C32AM (+) input has a diode and resistor in parallel and that both are tied to VDD?

        2. The diagram in the “Assumed Input Structure of DS26C32AM Receiver - 14 Aug 2013.pdf” file shows the inputs having 10.6k-Ohm series resistors before the diodes. Do the DS26C32AM’s inputs also have series resistors between the inputs and the protection diodes?

        3. Referencing the diagram in the “Assumed Input Structure of DS26C32AM Receiver - 14 Aug 2013.pdf” file, which resistors would be considered “fail/safe resistors”? For the (+) input, would resistor R0 be the “fail/safe resistor” with R3, R4 and R5 not being present in the circuit?

        4. Is it possible for you to provide me with a diagram/schematic of the DS26C32AM’s input protection circuit?

    Thanks, Richard

  • Hi Richard,

    When you look into the device, the first thing you see is the ESD diodes. The ESD diodes protect input structure(i.e fail/safe network) and etc. Please note the data sheet(inputs >=2000V and other pins >=1000V). 

    The fail/safe Resistors normally are the pull up/down Resistors. However, this is one of our older part and i was not able to find the input model.

    Regards,,nasser

  • Thanks for all of the responses, Nasser.

    If you come across the input diagram for this part at sometime in the future, please upload it to this post.

    Thanks,

    Richard Nichols