The TUSB7320 EVM implementation provided ESD protection on all 3 USB pairs, but only supports EMI filtering on 2 pairs. Refer to SLLU146C page 15.
Is there perhaps some undisclosed issue with EMI filtering on the superspeed receive pair?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
The TUSB7320 EVM implementation provided ESD protection on all 3 USB pairs, but only supports EMI filtering on 2 pairs. Refer to SLLU146C page 15.
Is there perhaps some undisclosed issue with EMI filtering on the superspeed receive pair?
Hi Elias,
Not sure how to be clearer. All three pairs on each connector should have both ESD protection and EMI suppression for commercial applications.
For instance on J1:
1. USB_D pair (pins 1,2) has ESD protection and EMI suppression via L2.
2. USBSS_TX pair (pins 8,9) has ESD protection and EMI suppression via L4.
3. USBSS_RX pair (pins 5,6) has only ESD protection via U25. There is no comon-mode EMI choke on this pair. This presents a conducted EMI issue. Going to the trouble of plugging two EMI "holes" without plugging the third seems odd.
4. Normally, I would add ferrites to both VBus and Ground as well...
Does this clear things up?
Best,
Dave
Thanks, Elias.
My main concern was that there might be an issue with the superspeed receiver on-chip that made adding a common-mode choke to the pair problematic.
Best,
Dave