This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CAN application: Transceiver chip ISO1050

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ISO1050, ISO3082

Hi,

For long (600m) bus length CAN application, I am considering the ISO1050 CAN transceiver:

1- We need to support 10K to 125Kbps

2- We will need to support up to 70 devices on a bus.

Would like to know if there is a limit on the minimum bit-rate that the transceiver can handle?

What is the limit on number of devices (ISO1050) on the bus?

 

Thank,

Ran

  • Hello Ran,

    1. The ISO1050 has a feature called Dominant Timeout (tDOM) that prevents a node from monopolizing the bus in the event of a fault.  Unfortunately it kicks in around at a datasheet minimum = 300us or 3.33kbps and would be the absolute minimum speed for one dominant bit.  In the bit stuffing algorithm from the CAN protocol, the longest sequence of 1’s or 0's is five, so the minimum frequency would be 16.66kbps.

    2. In CAN, the Dominant-to-Recessive timing is achieved by the RC decay of the network (Passive).  70 nodes on 600m of a double terminated CAT5E 100 Ohm Differential Bus, the Rdiff =~47.9 ohms (50 ohms || [80k/70] ohms) and Cdiff = ~31.41nF (3pF * 70 + 52pF * 600).  This would give a total theoretically 2.3 RC (90% transitioned) and 5RC (99.3% transitioned) Dominant to Recessive system timing [{2.3|5} * 47.9 ohms * 31.4nF] = ~3.46us | ~7.52us respectively. In actuality, these numbers will be significantly larger due to internal device charging.

    3. Another important consideration is the VOD attenuation loss at 600 meters of the cable.  600m of CAT5E cable models as a 56.4 series resistors.  The differential load a driver sees under this long cable is ~64.2 ohms (100 ohms || 212.8 ohms || [80k/70] ohms) so VOD = ~1.55V. The VOD over the longest run length a receiver will have is ~730mV which is below the VIT(+) trip level of this device [900mV].

    Conclusion: I assumed CAT5E cable because the values were readily available, but it gives you a proxy and equations to perform your own modeling.  A CAN device is not ideal for your 600m system, you might want to look into our ISO RS-485 devices [ISO3082 might be a good choice] which has faster transitions with double the output amplitude, and a +/-200mV Input Threshold (VIT’s) at the receiver.

    Regards,

    Bryce Sinclair

    Industrial Interface Applications Engineer