Hello,
our application with SN65HVD251 was tested according ISO11783, but one test failed. The transceiver is'nt able to detect recessive
bit levels at all CAN voltage Levels.
Did anybody know the reason or have had the same problems?
greatings Ingo
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
our application with SN65HVD251 was tested according ISO11783, but one test failed. The transceiver is'nt able to detect recessive
bit levels at all CAN voltage Levels.
Did anybody know the reason or have had the same problems?
greatings Ingo
Hi Michael,
i really don't know the reason why physical layer test failed. The commissioned test lab tested according ISO 11783 and 99% passed. Also the test "Verify the ECU is able to detect dominant bit Levels at all CAN voltage levels".
But the complementary test "Verify the ECU ist able to detect recessive bit Levels at all CAN voltage Levels" has failed. I don't know the meaning of "CAN voltage". It could be a verification of compatibility 3.3V/5.0V Systems, or it meant function on several CAN bias voltages?
All the criteria ar not adjustable by me, they belong to the values given by the datasheet, but there ISO 11783 is certified.
greatings Ingo
Hi Ingo,
When you reply in this forum, you should see an option to "use rich formatting" (towards the bottom of the text input area). If you click this it will bring you to a text editor with additional features. You can use that editor to either attach files to your post or insert media (like images) in-line with the text.
Alternatively, you can also send me images through e-mail if you prefer. My e-mail address is (first initial)-(last name)@ti.com.
It would be interesting to see the waveforms when the RX signal is lengthened - it should help us better understand what is going on and track down the source of the problem.
Regards,
Max Robertson