• State
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 492 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TLK10232 for initialization order of the opposite configuration

Hideo Tsutsui
Prodigy 140 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLK10232

Hello

It's now tested with the following configuration.


■ Configuration
· Case1 (LoopBack)
   Board # 1 [FPGA (XAUI) → TLK10232 (10G-KR)] → Cable
                                                                                        ↓↓ (LoopBack)
   Board # 1 [FPGA (XAUI) ← TLK10232 (10G-KR)] ← Cable

· Case2 (facing)
   Board # 1 [FPGA (XAUI) → TLK10232 (10G-KR)] → Cable
                                                                                        ↓↓
   Board # 2 [FPGA (XAUI) ← TLK10232 (10G-KR)] ← Cable


■ Q1
Therefore, in Case1 and Case2, when carrying out the initialization (Link training, AutoNegotiation, etc.), because the configuration is different, whether you need constraints such as access procedure?

■ Q2
During initialization in Case2, or Board # 1 and the Board # 2 There is a problem to implement simultaneous?
If the problem certain way, the access method used in Case1, like the Board # 1⇒Board # 2, is scheduled be conducted in order.

Thank you will please more.

  • 0
    TI__Genius 16150 points
    Hi,

    We are checking your question, I´ll be back with the answer.

    Regards,
    Luis
  • 0 in reply to Luis Omar Moran
    Prodigy 140 points
    Hello, team

    I have a question in addition.

    ■ test configuration
    Configuration 1 (cable wrapping)
    Board # 1 → (10G-KR) → coaxial cable → (10G-KR) → board # 1

    Configuration 2 (normal operation)
    Board # 1 → (10G-KR) → E / O → optical fiber → O / E → (10G-KR) → board # 2


    ■ Q3
    When normal operation (Configuration 2), in the board # 1 and # 2 board, auto-negotiation and link training, respectively, Is recommended procedure to implement and in what order?

    Draft 1 (one side LoopBack state)
    ① to board # 2 (HS side Loop-Back) state, the board # 1 side, AN / LT implementation.
    ② on the board # is in 1 (HS side Loop-Back) state, board # 2 side, AN / LT implementation.

    Draft 2 (normal operation state)
    ① board # 1 (HS_TX side setting) → like a board # 2 (HS_RX setting), set the board # 1 and # 2 board alternately, I read also training result alternately.

    Best Regards