• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 496 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

SN65LVPE512 and SN65LVPE502A/B

K.Yaita
Guru 29710 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65LVPE512, SN65LVPE502A, TUSB551, TUSB501

Hi Team,

Which do you recommend SN65LVPE512 or SN65LVPE502A/B for customer's new project?
It seems SN65LVPE512 is newer one.
Could you also tell me the difference between SN65LVPE512 and SN65LVPE502A/B?

Best Regards,
Yaita / Japan disty

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 36085 points

    Hello Yaita-san,

       We recommend to use the SN65LVPE512 since it has all the SN65LVPE502A improvements plus:

    • Fixes LFPS compliance test failures when de-emphasis is added observed in LVPE502A.
    • De-emphasis and OS levels changed.

    Please let me know if the customer's implementation is Host side or device side, If the customer is willing to use the re-driver on a device implementation, then I recommend to use the SN65LVPE502B, and for movil applications the best options is the TUSB551 or the TUSB501.

    Regards,

    Diego.

  • 0 in reply to Diego Cortes
    Guru 29710 points

    Hi Diego-san,

    Thank you for your support.
    My customer's application is note PC(Host side).
    I understood SN65LVPE512 is recommended for dual channel requirement.

    Best Regards,
    Yaita