The SN65LVDS104 datasheet specifies the LVDS output parameters Differential output voltage magnitude (at 100 Ohms differential load) and Steady-state common-mode output voltage, and provides min and max values.
One (extreme) way to estimate worst case VOL is to take the minimum common-mode output voltage and subtract the maximum Differential output voltage magnitude (1.125 - 0.454 = 0.671V). Similarly, a way to estimate worst case VOH is to take the maximum common-mode output voltage and add the maximum Differential output voltage magnitude (1.375 + 0.454 = 1.829V). However, a typical LVDS signal swings from around 1V to around 1.4V, with a common mode of around 1.2V. It seems unlikely the output of the SN65LVDS104 would ever swing from 0.671V to 1.829V. In other words, the above approach seems it may be stacking too many extremes. It seems more likely the actual swings will be bounded to something less extreme.
Figures 13 and 14 show how VOL and VOH can vary with load current (at room temp and nominal voltage). However, in our case, we expect a differential load of around 100 Ohms is always present, so those figures don't help. They do show what can happen if the load disappears, but our intent is to understand worst case VOH and VOL with a load present. VOH and VOL don’t appear to be specified elsewhere in the datasheet.
Does TI have any characterization data that would show what to expect over the full operating temperature range of -40C to 85C?
Can the IBIS model for this device be trusted to determine this for min and max PVT cases (including over the full operating temperature range of -40C to 85C)? (Not all IBIS models or of excellent quality and/or worthy of use for making design decisions)
Any other options or approaches to bound VOH and VOL less extremely?
Please advise and thanks.