Hello there,
I'm looking to get clarification on the advantages/disadvantages of using the following two DDC methods (for an active HDMI cable booster)...
A) TMDS181's full Active DDC block (DDC lines into the TMDS181 via SDA_SRC/SCL_SRC ..then out of TMDS181 through SDA_SNK/SCL_SNK)
vs.
B) DDC Snoop only mode (DDC lines in bypass only tapping into the TMDS181's SCL_SNK & SDA_SNK pins while the SCL_SRC & SDA_SRC are grounded).
I've tried both hardware implementations as outlined in the datasheet, and both work fine...but what I need is a recommendation for maximizing compatibility in the field long term.
- Which mode would maximize successful interop between HDMI source/sink devices? (even if theoretically)
- Are both options capable of allowing proper Snoop function needed to update the TMDS_CLOCK_RATIO_STATUS bit? (for HDMI 2.0a usage)
I guess I’m trying to understand why TI seems to lean towards the DDC Snoop-only mode over it's own Active DDC block.
thanks,
Jack
ake a difference either way...although the customer mentioned that HDMI sources and sinks with different Vol/Voh could be correctly level shifted by TMDS181...improving interop (in theory). My question,