Hi Team,
Based on datasheet, TLIN1029-Q1 "conforms to SAEJ2602 Recommended Practice for LIN."
The question is, how about SAEJ2602-2? What 's the difference with -2?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Team,
Based on datasheet, TLIN1029-Q1 "conforms to SAEJ2602 Recommended Practice for LIN."
The question is, how about SAEJ2602-2? What 's the difference with -2?
Naoki-san,
The SAEJ2602 recommended practices for LIN (including SAEJ2602-2) have been compiled with the design practice for the load resistor on the LIN bus to be external to the transceiver. The TLIN1029, however, integrates the load resistor within the transceiver. Other than this difference in design practice, the TLIN1029 performs in compliance with the physical layer recommendations laid out in the SAEJ2602-2 standard.
See the excerpt below from the TLIN1029 datasheet regarding the internal pull-up resistor.
Please let me know if I may clarify anything further, or if you have any specific questions regarding your application.
Best Regards,
Max Megee