Part Number: TPS25810A-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS25810-Q1, , TPS2514A-Q1
Hi,
Except for except for blocks which are different specification as below, are TPS25810A-Q1 chip and TPS25810-Q1 common chip?
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: TPS25810A-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS25810-Q1, , TPS2514A-Q1
Hi,
Except for except for blocks which are different specification as below, are TPS25810A-Q1 chip and TPS25810-Q1 common chip?
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
TQ,
The differences are minor.
|
TPS25810A-Q1 |
TPS25810-Q1 |
|
|
Current Limit |
Fixed to 3.4A |
Selectable 3.4A or 1.7A |
|
Cable Compensation |
Yes, Digital |
No |
|
Load Detect |
No |
Yes, used for port power mgmt |
Regards,
John
Kuramochi-san,
Here is some additional background.
The TPS25810-Q1 is the original released device for Type-C port control.
The TPS25810A-Q1 was a minor change from TPS25810-Q1.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
John
Sorry, tables did not paste.
TPS25810-Q1 (Table 3 from datasheet)
| CHG | CHG_HI | CC CAPABILITY BROADCAST | CURRENT LIMIT (TYP) | LOAD DETECT THRESHOLD (TYP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | STD | 1.7 A | NA |
| 0 | 1 | STD | 1.7 A | NA |
| 1 | 0 | 1.5 A | 1.7 A | NA |
| 1 | 1 | 3 A | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
TPS25810A-Q1 (Table 3 from datasheet)
| CHG | CHG_HI | CC CAPABILITY BROADCAST | CURRENT LIMIT (TYP) | CS THRESHOLD (TYP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | STD | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
| 0 | 1 | STD | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
| 1 | 0 | 1.5 A | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
| 1 | 1 | 3 A | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
John-san,
Thank you for your information.
My inquiry was unclear, I'm sorry.
The customer would like to know if TPS25810-Q1 and TPS25810A-Q1 are same tendency on the reliability.
They have tested TPS25810-Q1 and confirmed what it is no problem on reliability.
And they hope what TPS25810A-Q1 test result is same with TPS25810-Q1.
I asked chip difference because I think that reliability is almost same if chips is similar.
Needless to say, they will test actually.
They are requiring this for their reference.
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
Kuramochi-san,
The reliability should be identical. They share the same base chip.
Regards,
John