Part Number: DS90UB953-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AWR1243
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: DS90UB953-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AWR1243
Hello Nishant,
The CLK_OUT of the 953 is not required to be connected to anything. It is available if needed, but it looks like in your application, there is a local 40MHz reference, so you do not need the CLK_OUT. If you wanted, you could use CLK_OUT rather than the 40MHz reference, but it is not necessary.
In the Non-Synchronous with internal AON clock, the CLK_OUT cannot be used. – in any of the other modes, CLK_OUT can be programmed to be a clock source, but it’s operation is independent of the serialization that the 953 is doing.
Hello Hamzeh,
Thank you for your reply. That's right, AWR1243 Boost board has a 40 MHz reference oscillator. But if I use this 40MHz at the radar sensor end, will I lose CSI-2 data packets while transferring it through UB953-UB960 Serializer-Deserializer link? Because the reference frequency at Deserailizer end is only 25MHz. Also, the reference oscillator of 40MHz is only for the sensor side(AWR1243 Boost board). So I was thinking of connecting an external oscillator of around 50MHz( since the datasheet of UB953 mentions that the external oscillator needs to be between 50-100MHz) for the serializer UB953 and operate it in Non-Synchronous Clock mode with external oscillator because as Jiashow mentioned above, the Non-synchronous mode with AON does not provide a stable frequency and is unreliable. What do you suggest?
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Nishant
Hello Jiashow,
Thank you for the clarification. If the sensor works is establishing the CSI-2 lane data rate of the four individual channels with ref freq of 40MHz and the serializer is establishing channel rate of 4Gbps using 25MHz reference frequency during synchronous mode, won't there be data loss due to the mismatch in the clock speeds? If yes, what do you suggest to prevent this problem?
Thank you,
Nishant