This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

DP83867IR: Transformerless Design

Part Number: DP83867IR

Per Prior E2E thread with Ross Pimentel we're proceeding with a transformerless Design: Fixed 100Base-TX, <1meter cable, capacitively coupled.  We have the following related questions:

1.)    For our fixed 100Base-TX transformerless implementation we plan on using the DP83867IR TD_P/M_A and TD_P/M_B pins, leaving TD_P/M_C and TD_P/M_D open. Is this correct?

2.)    For this transformerless design are any external biasing and/or terminations required between the ac capacitors and the DP83867IR or is all that internal to the DP83867IR?

3.)    In our application both ends of the link will share a common ground reference, we plan on using a 100nF AVX ESD51C104K4T2A-24 as the ac coupling cap. This part is rated for 100V, with a 24kV ESD rating in a 0805 package.    It’s our understanding that since both ends of the link share a common ground reference the Ethernet isolation voltage requirements don’t necessarily apply but ESD issues do apply due to cable mates/unmates.   Given our transformerless design is this considered a robust implementation?

Thanks,

-John

  • Hi John,

    - If the speed is fixed 100Base-TX, TD_P/M_C and TD_P/M_D should be left open

    - No external biasing or termination is required

    - For ESD protection, it is system specific. I would recommend to implement similar ESD protection scheme, as if you would design with the transformer.

    Regards,

    Hung Nguyen