Hello Sir
I used the 925EVM with the 926EVM pclk 85M to measure the TP2 and TP3 (CMLOUT) signals.
The signals obtained did not meet the datasheet specifications. Is there any thing that we ignored? Thanks for kindly help~
TP2
TP3
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello Sir
I used the 925EVM with the 926EVM pclk 85M to measure the TP2 and TP3 (CMLOUT) signals.
The signals obtained did not meet the datasheet specifications. Is there any thing that we ignored? Thanks for kindly help~
TP2
TP3
Dear Charley and Casey.
We used the 925EVM with the 926EVM to test performance and using the coax cable.
Test the eye diagram on the CMLOUT pin of the UB926. The result of using a long cable and a short cable is the same for a coax cable.
The 60MHz PCLK is Pass. But the 78MHz is Fail. Please refer to the eye diagram below. Is there any way to solve it?
In addition, we use adaptive EQ better than manual adjustment of EQ. Thanks for kindly.
60MHz eye diagram is pass
78MHz eye diagram is Fail
PCLK Waveform
2: 925 PCLK
3: 926 PCLK
4: 926 R0(data)
PCLK = 60Mhz
PCLK = 78Mhz
Hello AJ,
First of all, 926 does not support coax configuration, only STP. Second, the signals measured appear to have significant common mode conversion which is indicative of skew between the P/N signals in the high speed length. That tells me there is something wrong with the interconnect. Also, not exactly sure how you are testing coax configuration with 926 since the EVM does not have a coax connector?
Best Regards,
Casey