• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 34 subscribers
  • Views 242 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS65981 and TUSB320I

Takahiro Nishizawa
Genius 5575 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65981, TPS65987D

We have a question.

Our customer tries to use TUSB320I.

But they can't implement this IC because pin pitch is too narrow.

So they try to use TPS65981.

Can we use TPS65981 instead of TUSB320I?

Please tell us the difference between TPS65981 and TUSB320I.

Best regards,

Takahiro Nishizawa

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 36756 points
    Hi Takahiro-san,

    I would suggest looking at the TPS65987D instead of the TPS65981. The TPS65987D is our latest PD controller which supports PD3.0. It is configurable through a GUI tool and can be 100% stand-alone when adding an SPI Flash. I would suggest checking out the TPS65987D and the TPS65987EVM to see if it can meet your needs.

    Thank you,
    Eric