• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 34 subscribers
  • Views 405 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TL16C754C: Usable for RS-485?

AnBer
Mastermind 30215 points
Part Number: TL16C754C


Team,

about TLC16754x:

-Can it be used for RS-485 too ?

-Do we have a comparison table for MAX14830 vs TLC16754x ?

-Are there other alternatives?

Thanks in advance,

A.

  • 0
    TI__Guru 62920 points

    Hello,

    Due to the Thanksgiving holiday in the US, our team will get back to you next week on this.

    Regards,

    Max

  • 0
    TI__Guru* 75041 points

    Hey AnBer,

    AnBer said:

    Part Number: TL16C754C

    Team,

    about TLC16754x:

    -Can it be used for RS-485 too ?

    It can if you provide the RS-485 transceiver.

    -Do we have a comparison table for MAX14830 vs TLC16754x ?

    No, is this required? Are you only interested in the C version?

    -Are there other alternatives?

    I need to know what the careabouts are.

    1) Max Baud rate?

    2) Vcc?

    3) Clock frequency of crystal?

    4) FiFO Depth?

    5) Channel Count required?

    6) Special features? (Software flow control? Fractional Baudrate support required? ect.)

    7) Pin to Pin compatible to another device competitor device a requirement?

    8) Intel mode or Motorola interface support?

    Thanks in advance,

    A.

    -Bobby

  • 0 in reply to BOBBY
    TI__Mastermind 30215 points

    BOBBY said:

    I need to know what the careabouts are.

    1) Max Baud rate?

    2) Vcc?

    3) Clock frequency of crystal?

    4) FiFO Depth?

    5) Channel Count required?

    6) Special features? (Software flow control? Fractional Baudrate support required? ect.)

    7) Pin to Pin compatible to another device competitor device a requirement?

    8) Intel mode or Motorola interface support?

    It is to find a cheaper alternative to MAX14830 so it should have comparable specs (see here) but does not need to be pin to pin:
    -4 ch
    -at least 64k word FIFO per channel
    -SPI/I2C interface on the MCU/Processor side
    -HW flow control

    Thanks.

    A.

  • 0 in reply to AnBer
    TI__Guru* 75041 points

    Hey AnBer,

    "-SPI/I2C interface on the MCU/Processor side"

    Our UART portfolio only covers the Parallel interface. We do not have any UART devices which are controlled directly by I2C/SPI like what the MAX14830 does currently.

    The only alternative I can think of to make our devices work with I2C is to use an I2C I/O expander to control the parallel interface of our UART devices. This ofcourse would require 2 ICs and take away from the speed since it would take a several of I2C transaction to just send/receive on the parallel interface side.

    -Bobby