Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS25810-Q1, , TPS2514A-Q1
Hi,
Except for except for blocks which are different specification as below, are TPS25810A-Q1 chip and TPS25810-Q1 common chip?
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi,
Except for except for blocks which are different specification as below, are TPS25810A-Q1 chip and TPS25810-Q1 common chip?
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
TQ,
The differences are minor.
TPS25810A-Q1 |
TPS25810-Q1 |
|
Current Limit |
Fixed to 3.4A |
Selectable 3.4A or 1.7A |
Cable Compensation |
Yes, Digital |
No |
Load Detect |
No |
Yes, used for port power mgmt |
Regards,
John
Kuramochi-san,
Here is some additional background.
The TPS25810-Q1 is the original released device for Type-C port control.
The TPS25810A-Q1 was a minor change from TPS25810-Q1.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
John
Sorry, tables did not paste.
TPS25810-Q1 (Table 3 from datasheet)
CHG | CHG_HI | CC CAPABILITY BROADCAST | CURRENT LIMIT (TYP) | LOAD DETECT THRESHOLD (TYP) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | STD | 1.7 A | NA |
0 | 1 | STD | 1.7 A | NA |
1 | 0 | 1.5 A | 1.7 A | NA |
1 | 1 | 3 A | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
TPS25810A-Q1 (Table 3 from datasheet)
CHG | CHG_HI | CC CAPABILITY BROADCAST | CURRENT LIMIT (TYP) | CS THRESHOLD (TYP) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | STD | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
0 | 1 | STD | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
1 | 0 | 1.5 A | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
1 | 1 | 3 A | 3.4 A | 1.95 A |
John-san,
Thank you for your information.
My inquiry was unclear, I'm sorry.
The customer would like to know if TPS25810-Q1 and TPS25810A-Q1 are same tendency on the reliability.
They have tested TPS25810-Q1 and confirmed what it is no problem on reliability.
And they hope what TPS25810A-Q1 test result is same with TPS25810-Q1.
I asked chip difference because I think that reliability is almost same if chips is similar.
Needless to say, they will test actually.
They are requiring this for their reference.
Best Regards,
Kuramochi
Kuramochi-san,
The reliability should be identical. They share the same base chip.
Regards,
John
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
Content on this site may contain or be subject to specific guidelines or limitations on use. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Terms of Use of the site; third parties using this content agree to abide by any limitations or guidelines and to comply with the Terms of Use of this site. TI, its suppliers and providers of content reserve the right to make corrections, deletions, modifications, enhancements, improvements and other changes to the content and materials, its products, programs and services at any time or to move or discontinue any content, products, programs, or services without notice.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs and
embedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.