Hi Team
Can you explain why there is diiference between the UQFN and WQFN and only the WQFN has thermal pad?
Is there any frequency restrictions between components?
Regards,
Roey
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Team
Can you explain why there is diiference between the UQFN and WQFN and only the WQFN has thermal pad?
Is there any frequency restrictions between components?
Regards,
Roey
Hi Roey,
Yes, there is a difference (also highlighted in the datasheet) because they are both different package options. Are you looking for UQFN and WQFN package options that are the same? Also, by frequency restrictions are you referring to the data rates? If so, then no; as the package type do not impact the functionality.
Also see [FAQ] Where do I connect the thermal pad of the logic QFN devices? and the referenced link for all packages that TI uses (and their differences):http://www.ti.com/support-packaging/packaging-tools/find-packages.html, thanks.
Best Regards,
Michael.
Thanks for the answer
I assume that the pad in the WQFN is for thermal relief
You mention that baud rate of the component does not change with package
So, the same power can develop on each one of the packages
So why to choose WQFN over UQFN? I mean why do you need the thermal pad anyway?
Does the WQFN getting hotter than the UQFN?
Hi Roey,
The dimensions and thermals are the main differences between both packages.
Please help refer to 6.4 of the data sheet for the thermal differences and [FAQ] Where do I find maximum power dissipation for a device? to help further clarify the power that can develop on each of the packages, thanks.
Best Regards,
Michael.