This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Difference between level translator and Line Driver

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320F28069

Hi,

Ref: TI  product lines:

1. Voltage Level Translation

2. Buffer/Driver/Transceiver

What is the exact difference between the two product lines. It seems one can voltage traslate from a Buffer/Driver/Transceiver also. Kindly suggest when to use a Buffer/Driver/ Transceiver and when to use level translator product.

I have 7 PWM outputs from TMS320f28069 (3.3V Logic), want to drive IGBT Driver (which requires 5V Logic). Which product line should I go with, to select an interface IC??

Thanking you,

Siddharth Gupta

 

  • Siddarth,

    I'll take a look at the TMS320F28069 datasheet to see if a level translator is a suitable choice.

    Best Regards,
    Nirav
  • Hi Nirav, 

    Thanks for the reply.

    What I am more interested is to know how

    1. To decide to go with voltage translator or a line driver/buffer; and what parameters to look for while deciding for translator or a driver.

    2. Construction wise what is the difference in the two.

    Thanking you,

    Siddharth Gupta

  • Hi Siddharth,

    you could use a buffer as a voltage translator. There are passive voltage translation which use pullup resistors for translation. Buffers can be considered as translation with drive . The LV1T family of logic translation devices are an example of this .
    for maximizing translation from a node to another , the input Vih/ Vil levels must be optimized. The standard CMOS translation for 5V will be 3.5V , which a 3.3V part wont work here since the Voh min will be about 2.9V . So the Vih of the level shifter device must be optimized for 2V to accept this.