SN74ALVC164245: Preferred package variant

Martin Grimmer

Part Number: SN74ALVC164245
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LVCH16T245,

Hello,

we have space constraints in the application and are considering BGA package variant.

Which would be the BGA package variant with the highest production volumes, respectively the longest product life cycle?

Thanks & Regards
Martin

over 9 years ago

0 ShreyasRao over 9 years ago

TI__Guru 64300 points

hi Martin ,

TI guarantees highest quality on all the packages and i cannot point out any specific to you on the package which has longest product life cycle. The choices to the customer would be the smallest form factor which fits their applications.
www.ti.com/.../estimator.tsp
This gives the FIT curve for each of the package.

0 Markus Nabecker over 9 years ago in reply to ShreyasRao

Intellectual 260 points

Hello!

I think one should prefer the 56-Pin BGA package.
If the SN74ALVC164245 is obsolete one can use the SN74LVCH16T245 as second source?
The SN74LVCH16T245 is only available in 56-Pin BGA package.

What do you think about it?

Kind regards,
Markus Nabecker

0 ShreyasRao over 9 years ago in reply to Markus Nabecker

TI__Guru 64300 points

Markus ,

I do not see the ALVC164245 being obsolete in our website. The LVCH and ALVC are from different technology family and could potentially be used to replace each other depending on the specific operating condition requirements.

0 Markus Nabecker over 9 years ago in reply to ShreyasRao

Intellectual 260 points

I didn't say, that the ALVC164245 is obsolete. I only tried to say:"In the case of obsolecense one can use the SN74LVCH16T245 as second source!"
Therefore, in my oppinion, there is a little advantage when using the 56-pin BGA.

Logic

Logic forum

SN74ALVC164245: Preferred package variant