Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN74LVC1G34, SN74LVC1G07
Plan to use SN74LV1T125 in new programs and as part of that i am looking MOS implementation of this part inorder to interface external logic
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Plan to use SN74LV1T125 in new programs and as part of that i am looking MOS implementation of this part inorder to interface external logic
FPGA driving the signal (Output only) and has two states logic 0 (0V) and Logic 1 (5V) and connected to Memory Signal (IO). The memory does some operation whenever receives as Logic 0 signal from FPGA and it does not do any operations when it received as Logic 1 signal. The moment when Memory receives the signal as Logic 0 and it starts doing some operations during this time it wants to send same signal as output which I don't want and would like to arrest this signal as output from Memory to FPGA. Is there anyway to block this using any discrete circuit from TI?
Hi Raveendra,
The below circuit will prevent damage to the FPGA and the Memory device. If you need voltage translation, the supply of the SN74LVC1G34 can be selected to match the memory module and it will down-translate the signal.
The 10kohm series resistor is used to prevent excess current when the memory module is attempting to drive the same line as the SN74LVC1G34.
have gone thru SN74LVC1G07 and looks this part is best choice to interface between FPGA and Memory device since I am interested Active low input to Memory only. And this device blocks when Memory sending as an output since it supports open collector. Any comments?
Memory never drive High during the period FPGA driving low signal.
Memory device has weak internal pullup of 100k, so few 50 Microamps current flows from 5V (of Memory) to GND (when both FPGA and Memory are driving LOW signal at a time) for a short duration of say below 5ms (application requirement) worst case. Is this fine right?