This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
A53 does not come with safety certification from ARM. In order to use A53 for a safety function in an ASIL-B system, the diagnostics listed in the safety manual should be implemented by the systems integrator. We are targeting ASIL-B with AM62x device. ARM STL is not integrated into the TI provided libraries and should be sourced directly from ARM. Please refer to the diags provided in the safety manual to get an idea on the type of implementation will be needed for safety on the A53 cores.
Regards,
Neelima
In the Arm safety IP feedback, A53 is compliant Safety here is the link, Why you said A53 safety certification does not come from Arm?
In Arm Safety IP list, A53 core is meet safety, why in the "AM62Q Safety Manual draft v0.2.pdf" is not use for safety ?
If A53 need safety certification/compliant , using Arm Software Test Library or TI own diagnostic safety mechanism can meet the safety compliant?
Hello Xuliang,
We integrate the ARM IP into our design and provide safety diagnostic mechanisms for A53. The ARM RTL supports ECC and parity on memories. TI provided safety mechanisms listed in the safety manual are sufficient to achieve ASIL-B on the A53 IP. Transient and Permanent faults in memory are covered by ECC and Parity. For CPU execution transient or permanent faults, one of the diagnostics CPU1B/CPU1C/CPU1D or CPU1E shall be implemented by the system integrator. We do not mandate the usage of ARM Software Test Libraries as the recommended mechanisms in the manual will be sufficient to meet the required integrity level.
Regards,
Neelima