This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In the MSPM0G150x datasheet (revised June 2023), there are many inconsistencies in the datasheet's pinouts for the VQFN package:
Many more examples of this exist, at which point we don't know what to trust in the datasheet.
The same inconsistencies do not appear for the 64-pin package (which seem to match correctly between the two tables).
Especially, the pinouts of the following peripherals are needed for our application:
This is the case despite the MSPM0G1507 being available only in the 24 VQFN package on ti.com website.
Hello Maximilien,
Table 6-1 is correct here, it appears table 6-3 is not including all the options for the pins; this will get resolved in the next datasheet update.
Regards,
Luke
Not only is it not including all the options, the one option is incorrect (pin 11 vs pins 9+24).
SysConfig was also able to add another confirmation, but it's unclear what to trust (especially when a PCB is in the works).
Hi Maximilien,
You can trust the Sysconfig and Table 6-1, I'm personally going through the datasheets to help confirm the fixes on Table 6-3 before we get them out.
Regards,
Luke