Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83869
Tool/software:
Hi Team,
My customer is testing the enet_lwip_cpsw example on the LP board, but have not seen success on Ethernet transmission. (ti\mcu_plus_sdk_am263px_10_00_00_35\examples\networking\lwip\enet_lwip_cpsw\am263px-lp)
They want to use a static IP address, so they have set USE_DHCP to 0.
The logs are as below:
========================== ENET LWIP App ========================== EnetAppUtils_reduceCoreMacAllocation: Reduced Mac Address Allocation for CoreId:0 From 4 To 2 EnetPhy_bindDriver: PHY 3: OUI:080028 Model:0f Ver:03 <-> 'dp83869' : OK EnetPhy_bindDriver: PHY 12: OUI:080028 Model:0f Ver:03 <-> 'dp83869' : OK PHY 3 is alive PHY 12 is alive [0]: Starting lwIP, local interface IP is 192.168.1.200 [LWIPIF_LWIP] NETIF INIT SUCCESS Host MAC address-0 : 70:ff:76:1f:6a:34 Host MAC address-0 : 70:ff:76:1f:6a:35 [LWIPIF_LWIP] Enet has been started successfully [0]status_callback==UP, local interface IP is 192.168.1.200 UDP server listening on port 5001 Cpsw_handleLinkUp: Port 2: Link up: 1-Gbps Full-Duplex MAC Port 2: link up [0] link_callback==UP 5. 91s : CPU load = 2.93 % 10. 91s : CPU load = 1.84 % 15. 91s : CPU load = 1.70 %
On the logs, it seems like LinkUP is successful, but ping 192.168.1.200 has no response.
When they tried on the CC board using the enet_lwip_cpsw sample program, there were able to successfully communicate (ti\mcu_plus_sdk_am263px_09_02_00_56\examples\networking\lwip\enet_lwip_cpsw\am263px-cc)
How would they be able to communicate on the LP board?
Also, please note the differences in SDK version. Is there a SDK10.1 equivalent? My customer could not find it.
Best regards,
Mari Tsunoda