Tool/software:
Hi,
Iam trying to implement x509 certificate verification of a signed image in in BFL format (signed using TI script tools for appimage ).
One scenario in which I used a sbl_ospi SDK example , customized the verification using Bootloader_verifyMulticoreImage(bootHandle) instead of Bootloader_parseMultiCoreAppImage(bootHandle, &bootImageInfo) as my format is BFL. I flashed sbl at 0x0 offset and this signed BFL at offset 0x80000, This verification /authentication is working.
But in another scenario where my certificate address of same signed BFL file start at 0x60008 instead of 0x80000, and for pointing the boothandle to correct offset I have configured the boot image offset to same , while i try to authenticate, it fails,
Can u help me sort out any why it happens, same signed file is getting authenticated in first case(testing) and the same is failing in second case(real scenario ),
Is there any configurations need to be done to read and validate a certificate from a non 64k or 4k aligned address or can u guide in a direction that i can get the certificate verified?
