MSPM0G1519: BSL_ERR_01 also required for MSPM0G151x

Hi Manuel,

Our internal tracker does not currently list MSPM0x51x devices as being affected by this erratum, but I am checking internally with our test and validation teams for confirmation. I will update you with their feedback as soon as I hear from them.

Best Regards,
Brian

Hi Brian,

do you have any update regarding this from validation?

Best regards
Manuel

Hi Manuel,

They are currently looking into this to confirm, but I am still waiting on their findings.

Best Regards,
Brian

Hi Brian,

customer has checked the DEVICEID and read a 0 for the revision ID, even though there should only be Rev A and Rev C (1 and 2).

Total value is: 0x0BBA902F

What does this mean?

Regards
Manuel

Hi Manuel,

Can you share the package label for this device, or know when it was ordered? The 0 indicates this is an earlier device, but when referencing errata documentation, it should be treated as revision A.

Best Regards,
Brian

Hi Manuel,

The validation team has confirmed the BLS_ERR_01 erratum does not affect MSPM0x51x devices.

Best Regards,
Brian

Hey Manuel, it seems that this device might have been an early customer sample if it is showing '0'. Rev. A/C would be the devices that are released and so the errata may not cover this since it was fixed in the official released version. Can they switch over to the current revision of the device? I suggest we shift this offline to discuss further Manuel.

-Brian