• State
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 324 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

RM4x safety standards

Calum Mackinnon
Genius 4155 points


For the The RM48x  - What does ISO 26262 ASIL-D add on the safety side - as compared to only having IEC 61508 SIL-3?

Cheers

Calum

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 30845 points

    Calum,

    Our RM48x line targets Industrial and medical spaces (non-automotive) and thus addresses IEC 61508. Our TMS570 line is directed towards the automotive space and thus targets ISO 26262.

    As such, in addition to an ISO 26262 compliant safety development process, the safety metrics for ISO 26262 are different than IEC 61508. ASILD also has more stringent FIT rate requirements than SIL3.

    Cheers,

    Abhishek