How do I use my own homepage on TiVa example?

Poster here appears to have well mastered the "basics" and provides a clear description of his (real) efforts and results.

Yet he was stuck - at a dead end/impasse.

How could he (or many others) have known about the fine detail you offer?   And - it's not hard to predict that such an issue would arise - is it not?

Might this suggest that "more time be devoted to clarifying existing documentation/code examples" and less to, "I NEED to build a quad - gimme everything - it's (always) Urgent!?"

Thanks Amit,

Yeah, indeed, I was way too quick to call for help, I didn't realize the instruction was actually on the SECOND commented section. Once I got the example working, I simply scroll down in a hurry to add my codes and when the my codes were working, I totally forgot to go back to that section. Thank you for your patience! Kudos to TI's FAE, for understanding stupid error can happen to anyone :)

David Chance said:

I didn't realize the instruction was actually on the SECOND commented section.

Hi Amit,

Issue is not w/you - but (again) at the (curious, and repeated) failure to properly "high-light" such very predictable, "Gotchas!"

Poster is skilled, aware - and yet (still) missed the critical point - (perhaps buried in the mice-type...)

Does this not "ring" of (oh so long) FAILED highlighting of PF0/PD7?   (Ans: of course it does)

What is the justification for "hiding" vital commentary in the "SECOND" commented section?  Clearly - poster missed it.  Why was it placed there?

Fundamental "warning/alerting" mechanics appear to escape many in your documentation department.  And - by contrast - each/every LM3S (may they rest in peace) was emblazoned with, "NRND (large type) - in glorious Red - TOP of Page 1 - were they not?   Why is that "horror" entitled to "high-light" while so much else appears in (hard to note) monochromatic, mice-type?  

David Chance said:

Since a lazy path is taken here by inserting the batch file to the pre-build steps directly, it always recompile the web fs folder regardless the status of the web/fs folder, thus rebuilding may take longer time for each build. If the website is stabilized, place the text "REM" in front of the command line in rebuildfs.bat so that it will skip it.

 Dear David, your hint is of no use to community than for noobs...

 I don't think this forum has noobs grade nor I think is correct check herself for answered when Amit FIRST addressed the solution of command reference embedded in source code and readme too.

 Adding absolute path IMHO is a MUST NOT DO!! I forever hate windows for this WORST unregular root path locked to past of uneven choices.

 CCS is multiplatform and I HOPE we soon see an absolute path free version, this BAD HABIT generate issue on Linux and more and more worst on the windoze platform unable to do relocation and getting ide crash when not on same disk.

 DON'T DO THAT!!!!

Sorry, I didn't realize it would add points to Amit (maybe extra $, too). I just wanted to close the thread so that TI didn't have to worry about it (after posting mine, it was the closest one to click to to do so)

I have fixed it already

The quick note is for my and others' future reference, and you don't have to use it

This is PUBLIC not private forum. Question of good education prevent lave post to himself, it is forever better close first useful answer too. (EDIT: added too)

(Edit add line:)

 Removing a verified answer on old rule was felt as negative and drop away some point.

Not sure what you mean, I really didn't mean to take any credit (which may lead to physical reward?) away from him/her, if possible, I will be glad to give ALL my points to him/her as compensation

As for the hard path, I can easily get rid of the one referring to the project. If a project is imported from the TI example, such as enet_lwip, SW_ROOT can be used to create the path for makefsfile, but if the project is creaed/imported via other methods, I am not sure if SW_ROOT global variable is still good for the makefsfile, so I keep this ONE in hardpath, like it or not

Anyway, change

C:\ti\TivaWare_C_Series-2.1.0.12573\tools\bin\makefsfile -i C:\Users\MyName\workspace_v6_0\enet_lwip\fs -o C:\Users\MyName\workspace_v6_0\enet_lwip\enet_fsdata.h -r -h -q

to

C:\ti\TivaWare_C_Series-2.1.0.12573\tools\bin\makefsfile -i %1\fs -o %1\enet_fsdata.h -r -h -q

change

${ProjDirPath}/rebuild_fs.bat

to

${ProjDirPath}/rebuild_fs.bat ${ProjDirPath}

This is NOT wiki. I have been to many public forums, and never seen rules preventing leaving useful note for self and some other people.

Is this a written rule here? If so, I will fully respect it in the future

Sorry David, I also wrote in unreadable form, I am tired of too many are on forum without a  clear rule, if rule are not changed with new look, I am aware of too and no mention was published on change, so  I remember these rules where active:

You get point  and award from verified answer, so solving problem was a first rule,  your cancellation of your verify costed a point drop and I don't remember whatever other it was.

 With time another valuation appeared  in term of  star on top of messages, again no public announcement was seen.

 Today still is recognition of help by <<verify button>>  and appeared this new button "Like" none explained us what means to.

 My rule remain  to verify all messages helped to solution and NEVER cancel a verify also if left by mistake due it cost reputation and point to poster of that message. Is not a trouble for you or me but some hand at work comments are welcome.

David Chance said:

Is this a written rule here? If so, I will fully respect it in the future

 This is a very  good point of and again we may ask Amit if know about new rules and can point all us to where are them written.

David Chance said:

Is this a written rule here? If so, I will fully respect it in the future

 Hi David, I found where rules are hidden searching a forum, this new look is very less useful than old.

 To be of help to all other too here is forum rule and usage but I feel incomplete, no mention of Like button rule. At last the new anouncement too:

http://e2e.ti.com/group/helpcentral/w/e2e/455.07-becoming-recognized