SC4CE290NCPZ

Ari,
That part number is a custom implementation. Information is not publically available.
Sorry,Dave

Dave,

We're using the SC4CE290NCPZ on our new product design and I'm having problem building my project in CCS. I've been using a TM4C129x dev kit up til now and all's been well. When I come to build with the SC4CE290NCPZ selected I get errors as there's no SC4CE290NCPZ section in the TivaWare driverlib\pin_map.h. I could OR the #ifdef macro for the TM4C129XNCZAD (from the dev kit) as we were told the dies are identical. Would this be an option?

I've been advised to post here by your on-line support team.

Thanks in advance,

Dave

Hello Dave

Please see the other post

Regards
Amit

Thanks for the help Amit.

I've left a message as our FAI seems to have left TI!

Regards,

Dave

Hello Dave,

There must be some one else supporting your account from TI. Please contact the local sales office.

Regards
Amit

Amit,

My mistake - looks like I had two LinkedIn entries with the same name! When I checked properly, our FAI is still at TI and I've just left him a voicemail.

Thanks for your help,

Dave

Hello Dave

Sure, no problem. I will wait for the FAE's response

Regards
Amit

Amit,

Couldn't wait for the response so I went through the two processor datasheets and compared all of the pin/mux allocations and they matched. I replaced...

#ifdef PART_TM4C129XNCZAD

...with...

#if defined(PART_TM4C129XNCZAD) || defined(PART_SC4CE290NCPZ)

...and it seemed to do the trick.

Thanks for your help

Dave

Hello Dave,

And I did not receive any email on the same either. So as long as the pin mux values are correct, the pin definition can be reused,

Regards
Amit