This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
I've noticed that the VCO frequency for the 129 processor can be changed between 320MHz and 480MHz. The 123 processor, the VCO is fixed at 400MHz.
Other than being able to achieve different effective clock frequencies, would there be a reason to choose 320MHz over 480MHz or vice versa? Would you expect less power consumption when running a 320MHz VCO over a 480MHz VCO?
Aaron Geier said:Would you expect less power consumption when running a 320MHz VCO over a 480MHz VCO?
Would that not yield to, "Quick/easy" experimental derivation? And - as each application is unique - your (real) needs will be best met via this means...
Using another vendor's ARM - w/similar VCO choices - we noted (slight) changes in consumption. (this may/may not overflow here - thus experimentation suggested) The final (derived) system clock choice dominated power consumption - thus the VCO choice played a far reduced role. (again - that noted @ 2 other ARM vendors)
EMI was impacted (i.e. agency test/approvals) - and was influenced by the external xtal frequency - as well. The VCO flexibility provided here may enable a reduction in EMI - all things being equal.