This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi! I have a doubt in my i2c code:
I am using i2c with TM4C123 and a peripheral slave. Well, my doubt is using I2C_MASTER_CMD_BURST_SEND_START, all examples I have seen write while(I2CMasterBusBusy(I2C0_BASE)){} after to wait until bus isn't busy. But in my case, the debugging stops there and it isn't possible to continue. I have tried to omit this line and it works properly. My question is that ommitting this line, will be prolems in the i2c communication when running without debugging (delay)? And why?
I2CMasterSlaveAddrSet(I2C0_BASE, 0x0A,false);
I2CMasterDataPut(I2C0_BASE, 0x83);
I2CMasterControl(I2C0_BASE,I2C_MASTER_CMD_BURST_SEND_START);
while(I2CMasterBusBusy(I2C0_BASE)){} //Here!! The code stops debugging here.
I2CMasterDataPut(I2C0_BASE, 0x03);
I2CMasterControl(I2C0_BASE,I2C_MASTER_CMD_BURST_SEND_FINISH);
while(I2CMasterBusBusy(I2C0_BASE)){}
Thanks!