• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 787 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Evaluation kit for TM4C129XNCZAD

a.v
Expert 1255 points

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TM4C129XNCZAD, TM4C1294NCPDT

Hi,

Could you suggest an evaluation kit for TM4C129XNCZAD?

TM4C1294 Connected Launch Pad (EK-TM4C129XL)--Does this support the TM4C129XNCZAD MCU?

or TM4C129X Connected Development Kit (DK-TM4C129X) is this the only option?

Thanks

  • 0
    TI__Guru 59540 points
    Hello a.v.,

    The TM4C1294 CLP has the TM4C1294NCPDT device on it. This device is a 128 pin TQFP package vs the 212 ball BGA for the TM4C129XNCZAD so there is a differince in the IO capability between the two. In addition, the TM4C129XNCZAD has the additional security features available through the Crypto HW accelerator whereas the TM4C1294 does not. For a full review of the differences, I would suggest either using the product selector guide (www.ti.com/.../products.page) or using the compare feature on each of the part number's product page.

    In order to fully decide which board would be more suitable for your evaluation purposes, I would need to have more information on the specific features you would like to evaluate. Obviously, if you are looking for a full evaluation of all features/content, the DK-TM$C129X uses the same part number configuration you are targeting so it would be the best fit but these kits are more expensive due to a full featured board. If you are looking to do a rudimentary evaluation of the TM4C129 device performance and general use of some of the peripherals, the TM4C1294 CLP or TM4C129E Crypto CLP comes for a very low cost and may suit your needs.