This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi I want to use RS485 at 10 MBPs. I have configured the UART at 10 MBPs but I'm getting framing errors on bus. When I try at 115200 baud rate, all works fine. BTW I set my system clock to 80 MHz. Kindly could yo please guide me on this. See my code snippet below. Thanks
Regards,
Moh
//
// Enable UART5 so that we can configure the clock.
//
ROM_SysCtlPeripheralEnable(SYSCTL_PERIPH_UART5);
//
// Enable GPIO port E which is used for UART5 pins.
//
ROM_SysCtlPeripheralEnable(SYSCTL_PERIPH_GPIOE);
//
// Configure the pin muxing for UART5 functions on port E4 and E5.
//
ROM_GPIOPinConfigure(GPIO_PE4_U5RX);
ROM_GPIOPinConfigure(GPIO_PE5_U5TX);
//
// Select the alternate (UART) function for these pins.
//
ROM_GPIOPinTypeUART(GPIO_PORTE_BASE, GPIO_PIN_4);
ROM_GPIOPinTypeUART(GPIO_PORTE_BASE, GPIO_PIN_5);
//
// Initialize the UART for console I/O.
//
ROM_UARTConfigSetExpClk(UART5_BASE, ROM_SysCtlClockGet(), 10000000L,
(UART_CONFIG_WLEN_8 | UART_CONFIG_STOP_ONE | UART_CONFIG_PAR_NONE));
//
// Only enable RX and TX interrupts
//
ROM_UARTIntEnable(UART5_BASE, UART_INT_RX | UART_INT_RT);
ROM_UARTEnable(UART5_BASE);
ROM_UARTFIFODisable(UART5_BASE);
Mohsin Mahmud said:... UART5 - when configured at 10 MBPs - w/ RS485 - yields framing errors ... at 115200 baud rate, all works fine.
Silent here - yet surely helpful - would be "reporting of your results" - as you, "Methodically progress beyond "115Kbaud" - is that not true?
It is expected that your issue could lie w/in:
I cannot find your code which, "Sets the System Clock." Use of the "MCU's internal "PIOSC" clock source" is "unlikely" to provide the timing accuracy required.
As to "frequency deviation" - look especially for, "One side "fast" - the other "slow!" This magnifies "timing error" - and proves more noticeable as your data rate increases.
You must realize that such issues are best diagnosed w/the benefit of a "scope" - placed at "each signal end." (and with the signal traversing the "full" cable length.)
Note too that your Post's Title: "MCUxyz: MCUxyz" - presents no insight - nor provokes reader interest - at all!
Such (usually) discourages readers - due to the "emptiness" of such ill considered, "headline!" (all posters here "compete for attention" - the purpose of your post's Title is to, "DRAW READER EYES!") Blind part number "repetition" - fails miserably - in this regard! (and has past been noted & advised!)