• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 553 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TM4C1290NCPDT: Application Help

user5624527
Intellectual 800 points
Part Number: TM4C1290NCPDT
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: EK-TM4C1294XL, , TM4C1294NCPDT

We are using MCU TM4C1290NCPDT for our product but in launchpad for this controller EK-TM4C1294XL mcu  is TM4C1294NCPDT. So  on launchpad if we develop a code then same code will be run on TM4C1290NCPDT ?  As well as for TM4C1290NCPDT and TM4C1290NCPDT  Debugger XDS110 will be support or any other debugger will support? which will be best? I think XDS110 is newer and updated version so please help to solve this

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 191316 points
    Hi,
    The main difference between TM4C1294NCPDT and TM4C1290NCPDT is that the 1294NCPDT has the on-chip EMAC+PHY. You need to make sure you do not develop your project using EMAC+PHY. Besides the EMAC/PHY they will be compatible.

    You can use the XDS110 debug probe. The XDS110 debug probe is derived from the ICDI debug probe on the LaunchPad.
  • 0 in reply to Charles Tsai
    Guru 117855 points

    Hi Charles,

    Assumed that your east coast sojourn revealed (both) cb2/cb3.     (Washington D.C. Zoo)    It's hoped that they were on, "best behavior."     (and did not "deploy" their pitching arm...)

    Note that a similar poster earlier requested "best" JTAG/SWD Probe (for those devices) - one of your crüe (and I) suggested "J-Link" - available at great "student discount." (even for those "non-students")

    As world's top selling, highly capable/robust, JTAG/SWD Probe - which has long pre-existed/out-performed (lesser) devices - such warrants consideration...

  • 0 in reply to cb1_mobile
    TI__Guru**** 191316 points
    Hi cb1,
    Thanks for suggesting the IAR/J-Link as another great option besides the various TI choices (XDS100, XDS110, XDS200).
  • 0 in reply to Charles Tsai
    Guru 117855 points

    Indeed Charles - noted as well is the ADDED CAPACITY - offered by the J-Link - to enable the poster to "Freely Evaluate" (both) IAR & Keil - along w/continued use of CCS.

    By my math - that yields, "THREE IDEs for the price of (just) ONE" - and at (great) Educational Discount!  

    And higher & more robust performance - along w/support for poster's (possible) desire to employ an (almost) FREE ARM Cortex M0 (< 1.00 (USD) @ Q1) or M3, M7 - enabling "Best Fit to poster's App!")