Part Number: EK-TM4C1294XL
I am looking for a 3D model of the EK-TM4C1294XL Rev. D development board. A STEP file is preferred. The only related question leads to a .stp file of the chip iteslf without the board around it.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: EK-TM4C1294XL
I am looking for a 3D model of the EK-TM4C1294XL Rev. D development board. A STEP file is preferred. The only related question leads to a .stp file of the chip iteslf without the board around it.
Hello Vince,
I had a look through all of the design files we have generated for that EVM but I do not see any 3D model files for the EVM available - for any revision for that matter, sorry.
Vince Schielack said:I am looking for a 3D model of the EK-TM4C1294XL Rev. D
Greetings,
While you are 'well within your rights' to 'hold silent' your intent w/such model - such 'forces' guesswork upon your (would be) helpers. It is 'suspected' that you seek to enclose or otherwise encapsulate this board. Our small tech firm has experience w/such '3D Scanning' - and hopefully our presentation proves useful.
There do exist firms which provide (usually) 'Rotary Table based, 3D Scanned Step Files.' And staff notes - prices have dropped - yet are 'still relatively high' - as the requisite equipment investment demands. You may be able to find such firms nearby - then compare/contrast multiple bids.
Prior to my firm's developing such capability - we greatly, 'Lessened our Financial Pain' - by submitting 'THREE BOARDS - for 'simultaneous 3D Scanning!' If multiple boards/objects - meet the 3D Scanner's Size Constraints - a single scan - capturing each item (may) be possible. (you would then have to be 'clever enough' to properly 'extract' each 'board/object' from the 'group file.')
Now to the, 'Utility of performing such for your 'EK/LPad' - we do not believe this board proves a, 'Good Candidate' due to:
This vendor's board (LPad) very well succeeds w/in its intended role. Yet - if we've properly 'projected' your objective - a far smaller (size/volume/cost) board can be developed - thus warrants consideration...
Should this writing have, 'proved of interest' - further detail (far smaller, lower cost board) is available (found here) via:
https://e2e.ti.com/support/microcontrollers/other/f/908/t/857547