• State
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 386 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

RM48L952: CSP-tests for fault injection

user5256995
Intellectual 295 points

Part Number: RM48L952
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: HALCOGEN

Hi,

In our setup, all compliance tests, provided in the 2.4.0_LDRA_Less-package fail on FAULT_INJECTION tests ( e.g. SRAM_ECC_1BIT_FAULT_INJECTION, SRAM_ECC_ERROR_PROFILING_FAULT_INJECT, PSCON_SELF_TEST_ERROR_FORCING_FAULT_INJECT, PSCON_ERROR_FORCING_FAULT_INJECT, FEE_ECC_TEST_MODE_1BIT_FAULT_INJECT, FEE_ECC_TEST_MODE_2BIT_FAULT_INJECT). This is so for ESM, FEE, PMM, and RAM tests.

However, in HalcoGEN, all selftests except for "Enable Flash ECC Check" are enabled. 

Are these compliance tests supposed to work on RM48 and if so, what could possibly be wrong in our setup?

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 200936 points

    All those fault injection feature is supported by Hercules devices. Did you run those tests using Safety Diagnostic Library without using CSP? I am sorry I don't have CSP on my laptop. But I will try those test after I install the CSP package later.

  • 0 in reply to QJ Wang
    Intellectual 295 points

    I am not completely sure about the difference between Safety Diagnostic Library and CSP, but I was running a tool included into the CSP package, SafetyLibraryTAU.exe (also called LDRA-TI-Qual) and a CSP test suite.

    Perhaps you could give me some advice on how our setup should be, to be sure that the fault injection is active? And then perhaps we could reason from there, what could possibly be missing in our setup, as it is now.

    Regards

    /Avenir