This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello Team,
My customer is searching for ways to improve the ADC accuracy, and from the Datasheet and Technical Reference Manual, it seems like there are two things they can do:
As they are using external reference voltage, their total error would be: (INL + OffsetError + GainError)/4095 * 100% = (4 + 4 + 40)/4095 * 100% = 1.17%
That is acceptable for most of their ADC measurements, but there are some measurements requiring better accuracy. Are you aware of any other approaches they can take to further improve the ADC accuracy.
Thanks for your help!
Dmitry
Tommy,
They use an external oscillator for the CPU clock. There's a requirement to verify if the clock drifts (for examples 2Mhz t o1.8Mhz) and they need a method to detect and reset the DSP. they tried using a watchdog timer but it has wide window and is not suitable here.
They are thinking to generate ISR and toggle a port and have an arrangement (H/W) to reset the micro if the port toggle frequency changes. right now, most of their discreet circuit use caps which puts 20% error over the lifetime. So that's why they need an alternative approach, possibly a dedicated IC which is meant for this purpose or anything else that can accomplish this task. Do you think eCap module is the best approach here or they need an actual external clock generator?
Regards,
Dmitry
Tommy,
Understood, thanks for clearing it up for me.
Do you think something like LMK61E2 would be the best option to go here ? What do you typically see customers use in this situation?
Regards,
Dmitry
Dmitry,
I'm told that it might be possible to use the HRPWM MEP scale factor to identify clock shifts. The HRPWM step sizes are determined independently of SYSCLK so it can act as a reference point. I am not very familiar with HRPWM usage so you will need to start a new thread for further discussion on this.
-Tommy