This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

MSP430FR58xx series: Device specification

Guru 24520 points

Dear All,

Please let me confirm the following questions.

[Question.1]

 Would you please provide the datasheet of MSP430FR58xx, if you prepare it?

[Question.2]

  Would you please provide the correct MECHANICAL DATA of Pack form?

  * Regarding to FR59xx datasheet, there are some differences in the Pin Diagram and PKG data in MECHANICAL DATA.

[Question.3]

  Regarding to the FR59xx datasheet on page 117, you explain about Device Nomenclature.  It seems that there is a typo in Second Digit Oscillators, ADC Channels, I/O. In my understanding, the correct description is as below.

   5: DCO/HFXT          4: DCO/LFXT

   Is my understanding correct?

[Question.4]

  Regarding to the FR59xx datasheet, you explain that the active current is 100uA/MHz. Would you please teach me the input voltage with this condition?

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Best regards.

Kaka

  • Hi,

    Kato Motoki said:

    [Question.1]

     Would you please provide the datasheet of MSP430FR58xx, if you prepare it?

    Here is the link to MSP430FR58xx datasheet - http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/msp430fr5869.pdf

    Kato Motoki said:

    [Question.2]

      Would you please provide the correct MECHANICAL DATA of Pack form?

      * Regarding to FR59xx datasheet, there are some differences in the Pin Diagram and PKG data in MECHANICAL DATA.

    If you are looking for the mechanical measurement of the packaging, this can be found in the product web page, "Quality & packaging" section -> "CAD/CAE symbols"

    Kato Motoki said:

    [Question.3]

      Regarding to the FR59xx datasheet on page 117, you explain about Device Nomenclature.  It seems that there is a typo in Second Digit Oscillators, ADC Channels, I/O. In my understanding, the correct description is as below.

       5: DCO/HFXT          4: DCO/LFXT

       Is my understanding correct?

    Nice catch, and thanks for pointing this out. You are right, if you look into Table 3-1 page 6 in the same document, the 5 should refer to devices with HFXT pins and 4 for devices with LFXT pins. You can double check also with the device pinout page 8 and 10.

    Kato Motoki said:

    [Question.4]

      Regarding to the FR59xx datasheet, you explain that the active current is 100uA/MHz. Would you please teach me the input voltage with this condition?

    Please refer to chapter 5.4 "Active Mode Supply Current Into VCC Excluding External Current" of the MSP430FR59xx datasheet to get the detail current consumption specification. The 100ua/MHz might refer to the IAM12MHz, 75% cache hit (specified as typical value of 1155 uA//12MHz = ~100 uA/MHz).

  • Hi Leo,

    Thank you for your responses.

    Please let me confirm about your answer.

    [Question.2]

      Would you please provide the correct MECHANICAL DATA of Pack form?

      * Regarding to FR59xx datasheet, there are some differences in the Pin Diagram and PKG data in MECHANICAL DATA.

    If you are looking for the mechanical measurement of the packaging, this can be found in the product web page, "Quality & packaging" section -> "CAD/CAE symbols"

    [Kaka]

    In my understanding, there is difference of Package layout.  According to the pin diagram and EVM, the package is not square. i.e. the corner is blunt tip.

     

    [Question.4]

      Regarding to the FR59xx datasheet, you explain that the active current is 100uA/MHz. Would you please teach me the input voltage with this condition?

    Please refer to chapter 5.4 "Active Mode Supply Current Into VCC Excluding External Current" of the MSP430FR59xx datasheet to get the detail current consumption specification. The 100ua/MHz might refer to the IAM12MHz, 75% cache hit (specified as typical value of 1155 uA//12MHz = ~100 uA/MHz).

    [Kaka]

    Regarding to your answer, the active mode is 100uA/MHz@3.0V..  Is my understanding correct?

    If you have any questions, please let me know.

    Best regards.

    Kaka

  • Dear Leo and all,

    Would you please provide answer for my questions?

    I need your kindly support...

    Best regards.

    Kaka

  • Kaka,

    since I am not the owner of the document, I can't really answer why the pin diagram is illustrated with blunt tip corners. However I believe you should refer to the mechanical data for the real packaging shape and size. Will try to check this internally.

    Regarding the current consumption, yes, as can be seen in the datasheet, the measurement test was doen with Vcc=3.0V. However i think, there is no dependency between supply power and active mode current consumption.

  • Hi Leo,

    Thank you for your response.

    If you can check the package size in internally, please let me know.

    When I checked the package with Lanchpad of FR59xx, the package is square.

    Best regards,

    Kaka

  • Hi Leo,

    Do you have any updates for my question?
    I apologize for rushing you but  we would appreciate it very much if you answer to it.

    Best regards.

    Kaka

  • Queries like that take some time to get answered internally. Especially if there's Pentecost (which is a long celebration weekend in Germany, where Leo is located, and most people take a long vacation weekend.

    However, I'd say, the drawing for the pinout is rather symbolic, and the one in the package drawings is the right one (that's why the package types are listed). Often, there are multiple packages available with the same pin count and layout, and it makes no sense to list the pinout multiple times with just slight differences in the package outline.

    If you are in doubt, order a sample and you'll know for sure. :)

  • Kato,

    I think JMG was right, the illustration for the pinout is just symbolic, and for the real package form and measurement, you need to refer to the mechanical packaging section.

  • Hi JMG, Leo,

    Thank you for your response and confirming.

    My concern is cleared.

    Best regards.

    Kaka

**Attention** This is a public forum