Dear experts,
Thanks and best regards,
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Dear experts,
Thanks and best regards,
Hi Ryo Akashi
Question: In datasheet P51 Table 5-20, Ri= 2k ohm (max). @8bit ADC and 2V DVcc. However, in Table 5-21, Ri= 4000 ohm for TEST CONDITION @ 12-bit and 2.4-3.6V.
Feedback: I am checking with the expert of FR2355 DS
Question: tSample= ln(2n+1) ×τ, wheren = ADCresolution,τ= (RI+ RS) × CI. In equation, Ci is only considered.
Feedback: I think the formula should be τ= (RI+ RS) × (CI+ Cexternal). I will check with the expert of FR2355 DS as well
Hello Xiaodong Li-san,
Hi Ryo Akashi
Please check the updated feedback below:
Question: In datasheet P51 Table 5-20, Ri= 2k ohm (max). @8bit ADC and 2V DVcc. However, in Table 5-21, Ri= 4000 ohm for TEST CONDITION @ 12-bit and 2.4-3.6V.
Feedback:
The note(1) is actually for the first column, not for whole ADC spec.
The Ri in table 5-20 is actually just indicating the analog MUX on resistance, not calculating the ADC’s resistance itself. This name should be updated to RI,MUX. we have found this issue. we are updating this name step by step. Please check FR2311 DS. Ri.MUX is used on table 5-20
The Ri in table 5-21 test condition is actually accurately reflecting the real input resistance.
Question: tSample= ln(2n+1) ×τ, wheren = ADCresolution,τ= (RI+ RS) × CI. In equation, Ci is only considered.
Feedback: we confirmed the formula should be τ= (RI+ RS) × (CI+ Cexternal). we will update the DS.
Hello Xiaodong Li-san,
Hi Akashi-san
I think the below items are correct.
**Attention** This is a public forum