I have exactly the same problem but don't know how to deal with it and ask for support. Thank you! The scheme I adopted is the same, which drives EMB1499Q in hardware mode.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
I have exactly the same problem but don't know how to deal with it and ask for support. Thank you! The scheme I adopted is the same, which drives EMB1499Q in hardware mode.
Hi Chime,
Can you follow the instructions of the last post please and confirm the waveforms are identical in your setup?
"It's interesting that you are not seeing any fault in the device. The discharge signals do look different than expected. Since the device is not triggering a fault, I would recommend to focus on the board components or any traces/connections that might be different between your new board (not working board) and your older version of the board (working board) by testing both. I recommend to compare the signals on both working and non-working boards to find any differences and trace the problem that way. You can use signals on figure 7 in the datasheet as to how the 4 signals (GATE_LS, GATE_HS1, GATE_HS2, PWM_CLAMP) need to look when discharging."
Regards,
Taylor
My malfunction is exactly as he described. I'm just not as lucky as he is, because I didn't debug a circuit board that could discharge.
My circuit and PCB are completely borrowed from EM-1402, without any modification.
I want to know, what controls the timing of the discharge? Why is the output of GATE _ HS2 not in the manual? It does not appear to be controlled by EMB1499.
Hi chime,
So you have all identical components to the reference design as well? Can you share the schematic?
Have you checked this reference for further details? https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sluuas6a/sluuas6a.pdf
Regards,
Taylor
Hi Taylor,
I download the www.ti.com/.../tidrn63 directly.
My project is still in the design stage, so I am doing functional testing. I debugged it separately by circuit unit.
I am currently debugging the PWR580a _ ACB _ Isolated circuit in Tidrn63.
See the following figure for the lap welding circuit:
Thanks!
chime
Hi chime,
Ok so if I understand it is our reference design, did it ever work properly following the guideline the first time? Or did it break over time? It is very difficult to tell whats going on if every component is soldered to for debug. I apologize but as I mentioned we are limited on support for this device currently. I recommend to re order a new board or if it never worked to perform a customer return of it.
Regards,
Taylor
Chime,
Great job debugging! Could you please identify what the issue was to help with our support moving forward?
Thanks,
Taylor
The main reason is that the electronic load I use may not be matched. I set the electronic load to CV mode, and the actual charge output will go to 6V, and discharge will go to 48V. The CV pattern is not constant or the response is too slow. This results in protection or burnout of the component, which eventually fails to work properly. It is normal to use the battery as a load.
Hi Chime,
Ok great thanks, can you please resolve the thread now? Please open a new one if something comes up.
Regards,
Taylor